On 09/07/2010 10:53 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On 09/07/2010 04:23 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
LogTarget class methods can be used to set a default logging target
and, as you mentioned, you could have also a per-process LogTarget.
You can add a LogMultiplexer class to emulate
log_add_
On 09/07/2010 04:23 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> LogTarget class methods can be used to set a default logging target
> and, as you mentioned, you could have also a per-process LogTarget.
>
> You can add a LogMultiplexer class to emulate
> log_add_target/log_del_target. It can be just an internal
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 03:45, Holger Hans Peter Freyther
wrote:
> Header File:
> http://git.osmocom.org/gitweb?p=libosmocore.git;a=blob;f=include/osmocore/logging.h;h=7f33155a8330d5bc59d0262140ed3e8fea34050a;hb=HEAD
Ok, so...
73 struct log_target {
74 struct llist_head entry;
75
On 09/06/2010 07:09 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Do you have a pointer to the API you're taking inspiration from?
Header File:
http://git.osmocom.org/gitweb?p=libosmocore.git;a=blob;f=include/osmocore/logging.h;h=7f33155a8330d5bc59d0262140ed3e8fea34050a;hb=HEAD
Implementation:
http://git.osmo
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:53, Holger Hans Peter Freyther
wrote:
>>> 2.) #doesNotUnderstand will not work from what I see as the Logging Module
>>> does not know who is going to add areas to it, unless I do something like
>>> LogConfig allSubClassesDo: []... is that appropriate?
>>
>> I don't under
On 09/06/2010 06:24 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> However, it's broken and only works if "instance class" has no instance
> variables at all. I'll shortly push a fix.
awesome! GNU Smalltalk is getting better and better, does anyone think a
windows version will help us to get more devs?
>
>> 2.)
On 09/06/2010 11:46 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On 09/06/2010 04:30 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
It's a bit ugly, but not strictly a bug. I suggest you use a
dictionary, and #doesNotUnderstand: instead of a getter, especially
because you're adding the instance variables to _all_ instances
On 09/06/2010 04:30 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> It's a bit ugly, but not strictly a bug. I suggest you use a
> dictionary, and #doesNotUnderstand: instead of a getter, especially
> because you're adding the instance variables to _all_ instances of
> LogConfig rather than just one.
Two more que
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 09:11, Holger Hans Peter Freyther
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am currently 'porting' (redoing) the OpenBSC/Osmocom logging framework in
> Smalltalk and while developing I see that I have one question/issue with
> updating the code.
>
> I have a LogArea which is a three tuple of (
Hi all,
I am currently 'porting' (redoing) the OpenBSC/Osmocom logging framework in
Smalltalk and while developing I see that I have one question/issue with
updating the code.
I have a LogArea which is a three tuple of (description, enabled, minLevel), I
have a LogConfig that holds a list of area
10 matches
Mail list logo
