49 ?
I m so sorry :s
Niko
2012/5/22 Steve Ebersole
> ok, i am going to disable the custom plugin for now...
>
>
>
> On Mon 21 May 2012 05:42:05 PM CDT, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> Nicolas,
>> it seems you opened 49 duplicate issues on HSEARCH; I can't blame you,
>> I guess you were clicking an
ok, i am going to disable the custom plugin for now...
On Mon 21 May 2012 05:42:05 PM CDT, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Nicolas,
> it seems you opened 49 duplicate issues on HSEARCH; I can't blame you,
> I guess you were clicking and debugging while attempting to create
> "HSEARCH-1131 Implement the
Nicolas,
it seems you opened 49 duplicate issues on HSEARCH; I can't blame you,
I guess you were clicking and debugging while attempting to create
"HSEARCH-1131 Implement the programatic API for @Spatial "
I tried to bulk-close them as duplicate, but the TOKENIZED problem
resulted me in blowing up
Same feeling. tags are flexible and cool, but it's not easy to see all
options and this drawback discourages reuse. Also their usage seems
coupled to trends and temporary attempts to organize things in
different ways, looking at categorization from different angles.
In a case like this as it's eas
Maybe this is what you mean by "flexible", but I hate that often people
just create new labels (different capitalization, etc) rather than
reusing existing ones. That is my one gripe about them.
On Mon 21 May 2012 04:41:51 PM CDT, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> tags are great for categorizing too. I f
tags are great for categorizing too. I find myself using tags more
than components
On Mon 21 May 2012 04:27:41 PM CDT, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I'm tempted to create different components for each datastore, so we
> can easily classify them and search for areas:
> - ehcache
> - infinispan
> - mon
I'm tempted to create different components for each datastore, so we
can easily classify them and search for areas:
- ehcache
- infinispan
- mongodb
- cassandra
useful to understand the progress per area.. we can later add more components.
Alternative, we could use labels.. but they are often too
Hi!
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Good point Pawel,
>
> Strong created a patch and I just applied it: please get the update from
> master.
OK, great, just merged it into
https://github.com/pkozlowski-opensource/hibernate-ogm
Tested locally and it resolves the "double
All of the remaining issues with the JIRA instance seem to be related
to that custom field. The custom field is used for associating pull
requests with the issue.
JBoss is planning the same upgrade, so they are planning on working on
getting that plugin upgraded. I spoke with the developer an
On 15 mai 2012, at 19:04, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Multi-tenant setups sometimes have data that is shared between the
> tenants (codec tables, etc).
>
> I think the first question is do we want to support this mixing? I
> think it is common enough that it is worthwhile to support it. And I d
On 16 mai 2012, at 19:40, Andrej Golovnin wrote:
>
> org.jboss.as.jpa.puparser.PersistenceUnitXmlParser assumes that the
> validation mode would be defined
> in the persistence.xml by the tag "validation-mode". This tag has been added
> in JPA 2.1 which is not yet
> final. Solution: add NONE t
We even know what it means ;)
It's a constant from Lucene, most notably older JIRA was using this
very old Lucene version which still had the old name; looks like they
finally upgraded Lucene in JIRA 5, but the version of Lucene being
used now breaks the custom field type for pull requests.
Basical
Ah, ok.
On Mon 21 May 2012 09:29:02 AM CDT, Nicolas Helleringer wrote:
> Since this morning I am trying to create sub task to HSEARCH-923 and
> when I click More Actions=>Create Sub tasks it open a modal box.
> The create button of that dialog do an ajax call that I spied in
> Chrome integrated de
Since this morning I am trying to create sub task to HSEARCH-923 and when I
click More Actions=>Create Sub tasks it open a modal box.
The create button of that dialog do an ajax call that I spied in Chrome
integrated dev tools (should be the same with FireBug in FireFox).
I catched there the respon
Nicolas, where did you see this stack trace? When I try to create an
issue, it just sits on that create screen...
On 05/21/2012 08:46 AM, Nicolas Helleringer wrote:
> When I try to create a sub task issue I got the following :
>
>>>
>
> [image: Hibernate JIRA]
> Not Found (404)
> Could not
Good point Pawel,
Strong created a patch and I just applied it: please get the update from master.
The JIRA issue is not resolved yet as there is some maintenance going
on, apparently "resolve issues" is a feature not available to us
today.
-- Sanne
On 21 May 2012 10:34, Strong Liu wrote:
> h
I even don't see there is a "Resolve" Button
On May 21, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I can't resolve them :/
>
> Anybody able to click "resolve" on
> https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/OGM-183 ?
>
> I just looked at permissions, and all seems right.. but I likely
> missed somet
When I try to create a sub task issue I got the following :
>>
[image: Hibernate JIRA]
Not Found (404)
Could not execute action
[QuickCreateIssue]:TOKENIZEDjava.lang.NoSuchFieldError:
TOKENIZED at
org.jboss.labs.jira.plugin.custfieldtypes.searchimpl.MultiURLCustomFieldIndexer.addDocumentFiel
On May 21, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I can't resolve them :/
>
> Anybody able to click "resolve" on
> https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/OGM-183 ?
not me :-(
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lis
I can't resolve them :/
Anybody able to click "resolve" on https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/OGM-183 ?
I just looked at permissions, and all seems right.. but I likely
missed something.
On 21 May 2012 14:21, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I do not experience a problem creating issues at all, so cann
I do not experience a problem creating issues at all, so cannot say.
On Mon 21 May 2012 03:19:25 AM CDT, Strong Liu wrote:
> yeah, just send out another email about this to the hibernate-all, and
> another big issue is I can't create new jira.
>
> On May 19, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-ogm/pull/90
On May 19, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Pawel Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I wonder if there are any plans to bump up Hibernate version used by
> OGM to 4.1.x (from the 4.0.1) currently used?
> I'm asking since - while playing with Neo4j integration - I'm bu
yeah, just send out another email about this to the hibernate-all, and another
big issue is I can't create new jira.
On May 19, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> They are still there as far as I can see. If you go to the direct URL
> you can see them. But there is something funky abo
23 matches
Mail list logo
