On 03/18/2015 02:56 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
>
> On 03/18/2015 01:53 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> Out of curiosity though, since you want more and more and more things
>> pushed to "second phase bootstrapping", I am curious how this new
>> expectation plays in with that. Specifically, us "using"
On 03/18/2015 01:53 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Out of curiosity though, since you want more and more and more things
> pushed to "second phase bootstrapping", I am curious how this new
> expectation plays in with that. Specifically, us "using" Jandex will
> certainly include us accessing classes
Out of curiosity though, since you want more and more and more things
pushed to "second phase bootstrapping", I am curious how this new
expectation plays in with that. Specifically, us "using" Jandex will
certainly include us accessing classes, unless Jason has added the expanded
capabilities he a
Massive.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 01:05 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>> Well I should also clarify that currently we are not using Jandex. That
>> was all work done as part of the mapping/metamodel redesign which we
>> decided to push to 6.0.
>>
>
> I
Both Date/Time (JDK8) and Money/Currency (JDK9) support are covered as
required development items for 5.0.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> Hi Elliot,
> I'm not the best person to answer your more technical questions, but
> since those who are are currently on holidays I
On 03/18/2015 01:05 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Well I should also clarify that currently we are not using Jandex. That
> was all work done as part of the mapping/metamodel redesign which we
> decided to push to 6.0.
I assume you mean the master (5.0) code base doesn't use Jandex but it
looks li
Probably we should re-initialize the service registries and builders held
within Configuration after the SF is built during
Configuration#buildSessionFactory.
Although, arguably what you are trying falls under the concept of sharing
service registries, and from that perspective is better handled t
That sounds reasonable to me. Create a JIRA if you please.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Stephen Fikes wrote:
>
> https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/4.2/manual/en-US/html_single/#persistent-classes-pojo-identifier
>
> The link above observes that the requirement to provide an identifier
>
Well I should also clarify that currently we are not using Jandex. That
was all work done as part of the mapping/metamodel redesign which we
decided to push to 6.0.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Steve Ebersole
wrote:
> I don't *think* we do, but it sounds like something we definitely need t
I don't *think* we do, but it sounds like something we definitely need to
make sure we aren't doing.
On Mar 17, 2015 8:41 AM, "Scott Marlow" wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Wildfly-dev [1] brings up a change expected for WildFly 10, to not
> reference the Jandex indexes after deployment completes. I'm curio
Hey all. Just a heads up that I had been in Big Bend the last few days.
No data service out there; yes, I choose my getaway spots well ;)
Anyway, I will be getting to the emails from the past few days today and
tomorrow.
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
h
Hi Elliot,
I'm not the best person to answer your more technical questions, but
since those who are are currently on holidays I'd just like to answer
you already and confirm it's an interesting topic.
We had a similar discussion around Date/Time types in Java8: they also
aren't supported yet out o
12 matches
Mail list logo
