Hi,
I started to work on the creation of the bridges for the classes in the
java.time package.
I was wondering if we want to convert the values to long using the existing
approach we have now for java.util.Date.
In Hibernate Search a java.util.Date is converted into a long that
represents the num
Hey guys
I want to introduce myself and a new database back-end worker, me and
another guy have build for hibernate search. I already had some initial
talk with Sanne regarding if this could be interested to the hibernate
search project.
I have been working with Hibernate Search from some time an
Hi Guillaume,
thanks! great input. Some comments inline:
On 4 August 2015 at 15:11, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Hi Sanne,
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure if this should be extending the @Field annotation as
>> there are special restrictions implied in
For what it is worth...
At the moment I am leaning towards changing the defaults for:
1) "use new id generator mappings" -> true
2) "auto quote keywords" -> false
As I mentioned, to me changing any of these defaults warrants a new CR (and
obviously documenting in the migration guide). I plan on
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:51 AM Gail Badner wrote:
>
> IMO, the JPA annnotations should generate tables/columns/etc that are
> JPA-compliant by default. If a developer is adding JPA annotations, I think
> there is a pretty good likelihood they will be referring to Javadoc or
> looking at the annno
Hi Sanne,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> I'm not sure if this should be extending the @Field annotation as
> there are special restrictions implied in terms of analysis: are we
> going to enforce a specific type of tokenizer, or simply take the
> analysis option away?
Dear all,
a second candidate release of Hibernate Search 5.4 was just released.
More details here:
- http://in.relation.to/2015/08/05/secondCR-for-hibernate-search-54/
Regards,
Sanne
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://
I more just mean from a documentation perspective. I don't plan on
removing the feature itself so much. Although I guess we can revisit that
when we rework annotation binding and finish up model binding in general
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015, 1:51 AM Gunnar Morling wrote:
> FWIW, that's one of the map
