On 13 Jan 2013, at 8:47 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Would creating a "real" query language instead of a serialized object
> representation make sense then?
You mean the Lucene query language -
http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versioned_docs/versions/3_4_0/queryparsersyntax.html
;-)
In the e
2013/6/13 Hardy Ferentschik
>
> On 13 Jan 2013, at 8:47 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
> > Would creating a "real" query language instead of a serialized object
> > representation make sense then?
>
> You mean the Lucene query language -
> http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versioned_docs/versions/3
On 13 Jan 2013, at 2:11 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> 2013/6/13 Hardy Ferentschik
>
> On 13 Jan 2013, at 8:47 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
> > Would creating a "real" query language instead of a serialized object
> > representation make sense then?
>
> You mean the Lucene query language -
>
On Thu 2013-06-13 16:10, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 13 Jan 2013, at 2:11 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
> > 2013/6/13 Hardy Ferentschik
> >
> > On 13 Jan 2013, at 8:47 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> >
> > > Would creating a "real" query language instead of a serialized object
> > > representa
>> Right, that's what I am also trying to see/find.
>
> Sorry, I got confused by your question initially. The query language is not
> for an
> end-user, it is for developers or machines.
So why would a developer use it? One point of the DSL was to have type safe
queries and now we want
him to
On Thu 2013-06-13 21:33, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> >> Right, that's what I am also trying to see/find.
> >
> > Sorry, I got confused by your question initially. The query language is not
> > for an
> > end-user, it is for developers or machines.
>
> So why would a developer use it? One point
