On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 12:55, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
> Does anyone know whether/how I could export all my existing chat logs
> from HipChat? I'd like to keep a copy esp. of all 1:1 chats I had, if
> that's possible.
Copy & Paste ? Such a powerful tool :)
If you're really lazy you could file a
Does anyone know whether/how I could export all my existing chat logs
from HipChat? I'd like to keep a copy esp. of all 1:1 chats I had, if
that's possible.
Thanks for any hints,
--Gunnar
Am Do., 6. Dez. 2018 um 17:03 Uhr schrieb Yoann Rodiere :
>
> > Hey wait a second :) You invited us to try
> Hey wait a second :) You invited us to try Gitter. That's fine but we
> never decided we're migrating to Gitter.
Sure. What I meant was that we are *de facto* done migrating to gitter. Not
that we meant it, but almost everyone is there already and almost no one is
on HipChat.
I wouldn't expect
I am never on HipChat at this point. So don't expect any important matters
to be discussed there ;)
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 9:08 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 10:25, Yoann Rodiere wrote:
> >
> > > You also need to use ctrl+enter to send a message, the default enter
> is a
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 10:25, Yoann Rodiere wrote:
>
> > You also need to use ctrl+enter to send a message, the default enter is a
> new line in your message
>
> There's a checkbox to change that, and its value is persisted, so you only
> have to tick it once. It's located just beside the "Send"
If it helps, Guillaume, the desktop client made all the difference for me.
And I hated the idea of moving to Gitter based on just the web client.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:25 AM Yoann Rodiere wrote:
> > You also need to use ctrl+enter to send a message, the default enter is a
> new line in your
On 12/06/2018 10:40 AM, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> So, I'm using Zulip right now on a daily basis.
>
> I maintain my first impression that it's really not user friendly.
>
> The fact that you are required to create topics for discussions
Why is creating a new topic (=typing three extra words) an
> You also need to use ctrl+enter to send a message, the default enter is a
new line in your message
There's a checkbox to change that, and its value is persisted, so you only
have to tick it once. It's located just beside the "Send" button, I'm sure
you saw it :)
But apart from that, yes, I
So, I'm using Zulip right now on a daily basis.
I maintain my first impression that it's really not user friendly.
The fact that you are required to create topics for discussions (or find a
suitable topic in a list of a gazillion topics previously created,
obviously without a search engine where
I'm fine with it.
Am 06.12.2018 um 08:52 schrieb Yoann Rodiere:
> The WildFly team is moving from Slack to Zulip, because Zulip seems to be
> the only solution that is free, provides unlimited history, and allows
> unlimited users even in private rooms (for OSS projects, at least). Gitter
> has
The WildFly team is moving from Slack to Zulip, because Zulip seems to be
the only solution that is free, provides unlimited history, and allows
unlimited users even in private rooms (for OSS projects, at least). Gitter
has all that, except unlimited users, as we are limited to 25 people per
On top of not being able to add more than 25 people to a private room,
there's another limitation of Gitter that Fabio just noticed: the chat
history for 1-to-1 conversations is very limited. In our case, we can only
see 2 days back, and there's no concept of archives like there is in rooms.
> Assuming the new chat platform takes off, there's a risk it might be too
successful as well
Ok. Well, I guess we'll see. As I mentioned above, I don't think forcing
people to have a GitHub account will be very effective, but I can't suggest
a perfect solution either. Bots answering with a few
For me its not so much about "the right kind of people". More just
accountability. But if some form of login in needed to use Gitter, that's
enough for me. Sounded like the other option was "allow anonymous", which
I wanted to avoid.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:41 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
>
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 17:27, Yoann Rodiere wrote:
>
> I don't see why we should force people to have a GitHub account, considering
> there are other means of logging into Gitter.
Ok.
>
> As to getting the right type of people, I'm not sure it's relevant. Most
> people are likely to have one,
I don't see why we should force people to have a GitHub account,
considering there are other means of logging into Gitter.
As to getting the right type of people, I'm not sure it's relevant. Most
people are likely to have one, and those who don't are likely to not have
one for political reasons
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 16:02, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
> What is it a conscious decision to not require a GitHub account to join these
> rooms? I just noticed that is a toggle-option in the room's settings also.
I don't remember. We created these rooms as an experiment in 2014..
Yoann created
The easy way to install Gitter natively on Fedora:
> flatpak install flathub im.gitter.Gitter
Or you can do it via browser:
Click on the main link here, then open and confirm install:
https://flatpak.org/setup/Fedora/
Same again on:
https://flathub.org/apps/details/im.gitter.Gitter
On Mon,
What is it a conscious decision to not require a GitHub account to join
these rooms? I just noticed that is a toggle-option in the room's settings
also.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 6:17 AM Guillaume Smet
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:35 AM Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
>
> > If one wants a lot
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:35 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> If one wants a lot of features then clearly only Slack is the way to
> go. Not saying we should go with Slack, just that we'll need to be
> patient and we'll always be short of some features - if that's not
> acceptable then only Slack
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 10:15, Guillaume Smet wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So, one thing I find particularly annoying with Gitter now that we are
> trying to use it for real interactions is the lack of notification sounds
> in the webapp. When you're focused on your work, it's really easy to miss
> the
It's not about having a sound, it's about having a notification e.g. if you
don't enable the OS sounds, you don't have a sound.
E.g. I think it's your Mac notification framework that produces the sound.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:31 AM Gunnar Morling
wrote:
> I'm just on their website, e.g.
Are you using the webapp?
Because I don't see any preference to enable sound and there is no sound at
all when I get a notification.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:21 AM Gunnar Morling
wrote:
> Have you tried "Room Settings" -> "Notifications"? We're on Gitter for
> Debezium, too, and in fact the
I'm just on their website, e.g. https://gitter.im/debezium/dev.
There's an icon with three sliders in the upper right corner, next to
my own profile picture. "Notifications" let me choose when I'd like to
have a sound, e.g. never, just for direction mentions or for general
mentions in a room.
Am
Have you tried "Room Settings" -> "Notifications"? We're on Gitter for
Debezium, too, and in fact the notifications were too noisy for me, so
I turned them off :)
--Gunnar
Am Mo., 12. Nov. 2018 um 10:59 Uhr schrieb Guillaume Smet
:
>
> Hi,
>
> So, one thing I find particularly annoying with
Hi,
So, one thing I find particularly annoying with Gitter now that we are
trying to use it for real interactions is the lack of notification sounds
in the webapp. When you're focused on your work, it's really easy to miss
the visual ones and having a sound really helped on HipChat.
There is an
Hi,
TL;DR: I created the Gitter rooms. Let's all go there for a few days, at
least to try it?
*Connecting*
Obviously you can just connect to https://gitter.im/ and use the browser.
You can sign in with your Github, Gitlab or Twitter account.
There are also desktop/mobile applications.
I think all day-to-day users of our chat voted. Here are the results:
IRC: 4 Yes, 5 "if need be", 6 no.
Slack: 5 Yes, 3 "if need be", 7 no
Zulip: 5 Yes, 3 "if need be", 7 no
Gitter: 10 Yes, 1 "if need be", 4 no
It seems Gitter won. That's the only option with more "Yes" than "No"...
It's
Not everyone voted, far from it; we're missing votes from Gail, Guillaume,
Fabio, Chris, Davide, Emmanuel, Koen. So no, no consensus yet.
I sent an email to them off-list, perhaps they didn't see this thread.
Provisional results are as follows:
IRC: 2 Yes, 3 "if need be", 3 no
Slack: 2 Yes, 2
Any consensus on this yet?
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:21 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Thanks for starting this!
>
> The choice of IRC is a bit special on the list as we never intended it
> to be killed: it has been historically important and we should
> maintain some level of reachability on it.
Thanks for starting this!
The choice of IRC is a bit special on the list as we never intended it
to be killed: it has been historically important and we should
maintain some level of reachability on it. So voting for the "IRC"
choice just means a preference to not use anything else on top of it,
Hi,
TL;DR: please vote here if you don't want to end up having to use a chat
tool you don't like: https://doodle.com/poll/h6scc9bsh6a4ymre
HipChat Cloud will stop working on February 15th, 2019 [1]. We need to
choose an alternative before we have our back against the wall, so I'll try
to
32 matches
Mail list logo
