On 2019-06-24 17:53, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> The query is selecting ids, so I assume you mean `1,2,3` as the
> expectation.
The test is asserting the result of `ROW_NUMBER() OVER( PARTITION BY
DISCOUNT_CODE ORDER BY SIGN(DISCOUNT_VALUE) DESC )`, and given the
`ORDER BY SIGN(DISCOUNT_VALUE)
The query is selecting ids, so I assume you mean `1,2,3` as the
expectation.
Clearly Firebird cannot support what the query is attempting to do - so the
best option is to skip this test for Firebird. However, the order-by is
really not serving any purpose to the test aside from making the
The test FormulaWithPartitionByTest against Firebird 3 fails because the
returned result has a different order than the one expected by the test.
As far as I can tell, the order expected by the test is arbitrary or at
least, as far as I can tell, the order expected is not necessarily
required
