nevermind. thank and Christian for the replies.
Max Rydahl Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You got two replies already and you still want to argue if you have our
ears.
Either speak up or don't ;)
As I said my background is medical systems and I disagreed with the level
of dynamacity you
You got two replies already and you still want to argue if you have our
ears.
Either speak up or don't ;)
As I said my background is medical systems and I disagreed with the level
of dynamacity you referring to...
you take it from there.
/max
sorry I don't see how Christian answer was se
sorry I don't see how Christian answer was serious brushing me off with few
classes to insert into EAV. granted the way I landed this on you deserves such
a reply but can we skip to the serious phase.
well spotted that I am talking about a deep level of dynamic. Serveral domains
not just the med
Christians answer was actually serious ;)
My background is medical systems and both HL7, GEPJ and the european
DH
has a great deal of genericity because the medical domain has it...but I
don't see how it requires
the level of dynamicity you are referring too.
/max
very funny. I had simila
very funny. I had similar skepticism until I worked in such domain. I
understand the issues surrounding such a model, I spent 15 years working for
Oracle. implementing it is not that trivial. there is a real need and I explain
the details if I have more serious replies.
Christian Bauer <[EMAIL
Hi hibernate-dev,
I have an interest in modifying hibernate core to support an
alternative persistence model common in some domains like the medical
domain. how do I go about it?
here is a small description of the problem and a solution:
problem:
Objects map one to one to tables as specified at de
