Awesome feedback :)
Let's make sure we can support these sue cases in the API or know how to extend
the API to cover them in the future. Once we are safe here we can iterate over
the underlying implementation.
On 28 févr. 2011, at 19:56, Marc Schipperheyn wrote:
> My two cents:
> * Most of the
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:56:32 +0100, Marc Schipperheyn
wrote:
> My two cents:
> * Most of the magic of Bobo Browse apart from the faceting itself is in
> the performance. I think the challenge with any kind of faceting is
> keeping it performant which Bobo achieves through all sorts of optim
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:39:27 +0100, Marc Schipperheyn
wrote:
>> The last release was over a year back and personally I find the docs
>> very sparse. I also think there is a lot of complexity in bob browse
>> which is not needed for
>> simple faceting.
> My problem is that javadoc is horrib
My two cents:
* Most of the magic of Bobo Browse apart from the faceting itself is in the
performance. I think the challenge with any kind of faceting is keeping it
performant which Bobo achieves through all sorts of optimized caches.
* The problem for me with Bobo is real time updating the Bobo in
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> thanks for your feedback. Answers inline
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:08:43 +0100, Marc Schipperheyn <
> m.schipperh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have a lot of experience with Bobo Browse. The code is well maintained
>> and p
Hi Marc,
thanks for your feedback. Answers inline
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:08:43 +0100, Marc Schipperheyn
wrote:
> I have a lot of experience with Bobo Browse. The code is well maintained
> and performs well.
The last release was over a year back and personally I find the docs very
sparse.
I have a lot of experience with Bobo Browse. The code is well maintained and
performs well.
I don't have time to download and implement code examples, but if you have
working examples up somewhere, I'd be happy to take a look.
Vriendelijke groet,
Marc
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:00 PM, wrote:
>
