Hi!
Just wondering if anyone have discovered that I uploaded a small patch for
having
Session local interceptors. I think it is worthwile having the option of
session local interceptors,
otherwise one would have to go through loops to support session-specific
interceptors.
/max
---
Ah. heh. yeah thats a misprint, isnt it. Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Andrea Aime" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gavin King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: Jmx error in 1.1.5
> Because the line should be:
>
> this.mapResources = mappingResources.
Yick! Sorry, I actually wasn't fully aware of this bug.
Are you suggesting the problem is here:
public void setMapResources(String mappingResources) {
this.mapResources = mapResources.trim();
}
if so, why exactly is setMapResources() being called with a null argument.
I'm confused
> Gavin, I'm not really sure what you meant by a Holder class that you
> mentioned in a previous e-mail. Would you care to go into details?
I don't have a set idea of what we need here, except that:
Use of java.sql.Clob class is non-useful, since it provides no way to
update the data. setCh
Gavin King wrote:
Yes! I like this idea a lotfully. Good thinking :)
Ok, unless someone else is working on this, I'm going to try to hammer
something out that'll handle Clobs nicely over the weekend. Any
advice/suggestions are more than welcome.
Gavin, I'm not really sure what you meant by a
