Hi all,
We're noticing some strange behavior with
Query.setFirstResult/Query.setMaxResults.
If we execute a query with these values set, we get the expected result.
However,
if we then execute the same query (in a new session, with a new Query)
without limiting
the resultset, we still only get the
Hello,
i have the following situation:
Group -- 1:n --> Recipient, Recipient has a property of type java.util.Map
Everything works fine, but loading the list of recipients is terribly slow
because hibernate executes an sql query for each recipient to load the
recipients's map. The logfiles look
I agree - looks great Christian!
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Max Rydahl Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 5:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Hibernate] New Wiki style
>
>
> Looks nice :)
>
> /max
>
> - Original Message -
>
Hi,
while I was writing tests for my code I ran into one "problem". Now,
I'm not sure if it is a bug or a feature. I am using Hibernate 1.2.3
and MySQL 3.x .
Some of properties in my JavaBean are marked as not null. When I test
the code I set that property to null and try to save() it. The except
This use case like
> obj.setY(2);
> obj.setZ(3);
> foo.flush(obj);
looks like object database. I think it is good idea to implement some simple
framework/Hibernate server mode.
I prefer language neutral and pluggable RPC, some of my client side
applications are native windows applicati
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ·s¦æ·~ ®ø¶O´N¯àÁȤj¿ú [...]
Content analysis details:
Feature Requests item #686571, was opened at 2003-02-14 15:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428711&aid=686571&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Alexei Guevara (aguevara)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
Patches item #685440, was opened at 2003-02-12 19:02
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=685440&group_id=40712
Category: Codegen
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Klaus Zimmermann (zklaus)
Assigned to: Max R.
Patches item #685440, was opened at 2003-02-12 19:02
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=685440&group_id=40712
Category: Codegen
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Klaus Zimmermann (zklaus)
Assigned to: Max R.
Bugs item #686509, was opened at 2003-02-14 23:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428708&aid=686509&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Cristian Carstoiu (carstoiuc)
Assigned to: N
Bugs item #687243, was opened at 2003-02-16 09:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428708&aid=687243&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Cedric Veilleux (smashed4)
Assigned to: Nobo
Patches item #686507, was opened at 2003-02-14 13:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=686507&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lorenzo (nicus)
Assigned to: Gavin King (oneovth
Patches item #682992, was opened at 2003-02-09 04:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=682992&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Juozas Baliuka (baliuka)
Assigned to: Nob
Patches item #687812, was opened at 2003-02-17 00:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=687812&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Ano
Bugs item #686993, was opened at 2003-02-15 08:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428708&aid=686993&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Konstantin Sharenkov (barnaul)
Assigned to: Nobody/A
Bugs item #684525, was opened at 2003-02-11 22:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428708&aid=684525&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steffen Lassahn (madeagle)
Assigned t
Bugs item #686993, was opened at 2003-02-15 19:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428708&aid=686993&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Konstantin Sharenkov (barnaul)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #687243, was opened at 2003-02-15 17:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428708&aid=687243&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Cedric Veilleux (smashed4)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anony
EOB
looks promising, but it's version 0.9 and beta. And it requires JDK 1.4, it
won't work with 1.3.1.
So it
cannot be used in a production environment (at least not
ours).
Also,
in your case, if you call 10 setXXX methods, you still make 10 remote calls
right? I would like
to
preven
19 matches
Mail list logo
