RE: [Hibernate] New query parser

Title: Message   Hi,   Just a general comment.   +1 on being able to get HQL to parse and process the longer versions but   -1 on removing older syntax. I like the short versions and would rather they were kept since I consider them to be convenient rather than redundant. I guess im use t

[Hibernate] composite PK properties and AST parser

Are composite pk properties access allowed with the new parser? One of my annotations test fails (it worked last week). ManyToOneTest.testCompositeFK org.hibernate.QueryException: could not resolve property: lastName of: org.hibernate.test.metadata.manytoone.Child [from org.hibernate.test.metadat

Re: [Hibernate] mutli-threaded single tx access?

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:25:26 -0500, Bill Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Will hibernate work with multi-threaded access to a Session? Also, if that Session is in a tx? We've implemented asynchronous EJBs and I want to know if it is feasible to propagate the TX to each one of the threads in

[Hibernate] mutli-threaded single tx access?

Will hibernate work with multi-threaded access to a Session? Also, if that Session is in a tx? We've implemented asynchronous EJBs and I want to know if it is feasible to propagate the TX to each one of the threads in the parallel call. Thanks, Bill ---

Re: [Hibernate] CVS Tag for 2.1.8

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, David Lloyd wrote: Looks like there's no v2108 tag in CVS. Was this intentional? Also, the doc/reference/en/master.xml file says 2.1.7 in CVS head. - D --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid

[Hibernate] New query parser

Guys, I’d like to slightly change how the new parser handles a couple of exotic (redundant) constructs. Basically, what I want, is that the first phase of parsing produces a HQL AST with a much simpler canonical form, with less Kinds of Things. So, for example:   “elements(foo.collection)” w

RE: [Hibernate] New query parser

Title: Message Transforming the index operator '[ key ]'  into a join should be straightforward if hql.g is modified to keep a 'stack' of  FROM clauses, just like hql-sql.g.   Then, you can access the current FROM clause and add things to it. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PR

[Hibernate] Library Size

Title: Library Size Hello, is ist possible to build smaller versions of Hibernate. With all libs Version 2.1.4 take more than 3MB. We're using Hibernate in some of our Applets, so size matters, so we're interested in getting smaller versions of Hibernate. Thanks, Kind Regards Ingo

[Hibernate] CVS Tag for 2.1.8

Looks like there's no v2108 tag in CVS. Was this intentional? - D --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Star

[Hibernate] create renamed to persist...

Hi, Is it intentional that create() have been replaced with persist() without putting create() on the classic session ? (p.s. *PLEASE* include metadata/tools/etc. AND their testcases when doing such broad refactorings ...tia) -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL P

Re: [Hibernate] create renamed to persist...

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:35:50 -0600, Gavin King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sure, create() was only there during the HB3 beta cycle. It was never in a final release. stupid shortterm memory! ;) btw. I reckon there is a good reason for having both persist() and save() available. Could we get that