yes, its easy enough, I guess...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Emmanuel Bernard
Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2005 1:50 AM
To: hibernate-devel
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] connect by
Not keen. With native SQL you can achieve these specific cases
Not keen. With native SQL you can achieve these specific cases, right?
Gavin King wrote:
Should we support START WITH … CONNECT BY in HQL (just for Oracle users)?
It’s trivial to implement I guess, what do you guys think?
--
Emmanuel Bernard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://emmanuelbernard
http://www.hib
What is the usecases for it ?
Its nonportable, so why put it in HQL when it can be done
via native sql queries where it kinda belongs ?
+0
-max
+1
And the "ORDER SIBLINGS BY ..." (Oracle 9i+) too (if possible).
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Te
+1
And the "ORDER SIBLINGS BY ..." (Oracle 9i+) too (if possible).
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a c
Should we support START WITH … CONNECT BY in HQL (just
for Oracle users)?
It’s trivial to implement I guess, what do you guys
think?
A fix of a very nasty bug in eager-releasing connections.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian Bauer
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 11:58 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Just saw some commits from Steve...
On Apr 25, 2005, at 6:54 PM
I don't think so.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Emmanuel Bernard
Sent: Monday, 25 April 2005 1:58 AM
To: hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Quoted schema names...
Didn't we have some trouble in 2.1.7 with a si
