Re: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2006-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
Not really, You were mixing 2 different strategies, 1 for hbm and one for annotations which was by side effect possible, but very bad. I've merged the 2. ImprovedNS always had the semantic (2). Pablo Nussembaum wrote: I don't understand why 2 is unrelated, this version broke the backward comp

[Hibernate] unsubscript

2006-01-10 Thread Ronye Tonini
 ...::: Ronye Tonini :::... Yahoo! Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ: 21273841Skype: ronyetonini Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.

Re: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2006-01-10 Thread Pablo Nussembaum
I don't understand why 2 is unrelated, this version broke the backward compatibility. Until now if I use the xml configuration or annotations, hibernate generates the same db schema with this change this not true any more. Pablo Nussembaum Emmanuel Bernard wrote: 2) is unrelated. You were not

Re: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2006-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
2) is unrelated. You were not able to work with custom NS in annotations before, you should consider writing an extension of EJB3NamingStrategy instead. Pablo Nussembaum wrote: I'm complaining :-P today I was trying to update from hibernate-3.1-rc2 y annotation-3.1-b6. I found 2 problems (I'