Re: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2006-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
Not really, You were mixing 2 different strategies, 1 for hbm and one for annotations which was by side effect possible, but very bad. I've merged the 2. ImprovedNS always had the semantic (2). Pablo Nussembaum wrote: I don't understand why 2 is unrelated, this version broke the backward comp

Re: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2006-01-10 Thread Pablo Nussembaum
I don't understand why 2 is unrelated, this version broke the backward compatibility. Until now if I use the xml configuration or annotations, hibernate generates the same db schema with this change this not true any more. Pablo Nussembaum Emmanuel Bernard wrote: 2) is unrelated. You were not

Re: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2006-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
2) is unrelated. You were not able to work with custom NS in annotations before, you should consider writing an extension of EJB3NamingStrategy instead. Pablo Nussembaum wrote: I'm complaining :-P today I was trying to update from hibernate-3.1-rc2 y annotation-3.1-b6. I found 2 problems (I'

Re: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2005-12-20 Thread Pablo Nussembaum
I'm complaining :-P today I was trying to update from hibernate-3.1-rc2 y annotation-3.1-b6. I found 2 problems (I'm the ImprovedNamingStrategy): 1. The one your describing 2. Some JoinTables change the generated name. Example: @Entity @org.hibernate.annotations.Entity(mutable=false) @Tabl

RE: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2005-12-19 Thread Gavin King
Title: RE: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy No more switches! :-) -Original Message- From: Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 12/19/2005 9:00 PM To: Gavin King; hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy Can

Re: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2005-12-19 Thread Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
Can it be switched on/off? The old behavior is kinda flaky ;). -- Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi DTQ Software Gavin King wrote: I guess we better fix it then. Note that some other people previously complained that they did not like the old behavior ;)

RE: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2005-12-19 Thread Gavin King
Title: RE: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy I guess we better fix it then. Note that some other people previously complained that they did not like the old behavior ;) -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 12/19/2005 6:10 PM To: Gavin

Re: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2005-12-19 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
I person did so far. Gavin King wrote: Well, let's see if anyone complains... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Emmanuel Bernard Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 7:06 AM To: Hibernate development Subject: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrate

RE: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy

2005-12-19 Thread Gavin King
Well, let's see if anyone complains... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Emmanuel Bernard Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 7:06 AM To: Hibernate development Subject: [Hibernate] ImprovedNamingStrategy When working on the new naming strategy