Hadn't we choose to keep most advanced work on HEAD. In this case branch
for 3.1.x?
This is a very old discussion that seems to come out of my memory.
Steve Ebersole wrote:
BTW
I have just branched cvs for the purposes of 3.2 development, as 3.2 is
expected to introduce a number of API
Actually yes I like that better.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Emmanuel Bernard
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 11:15 AM
Cc: hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] hibernate 3.2
Hadn't we choose to keep most
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] hibernate 3.2
Steve,
is 3.1 stuff in HEAD ?
Thanks
On Thursday 02 February 2006 04:35 pm, Steve Ebersole wrote:
BTW
I have just branched cvs for the purposes of 3.2 development, as 3.2
is
expected to introduce a number of API changes (mainly minor stuff
I also prefer it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Ebersole
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:33 PM
To: hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hibernate] hibernate 3.2
Actually yes I like that better.
-Original
