I think you need to understand how cascade="all" interacts
with unsaved-value, etc. If you have cascade="all",
update(parent) will pass the children to saveOrUpdate(). If
the children have unsaved-value="none", they will all get
updated; if they have unsaved-value="any", they will
all get inserted
Hi Jeff,
theres a little bug in Hibernate2 SQL generation that has been
pointed out in the forum, but it would only affect table joins
accross tables with common column names. Anyway, I will fix that
tonight or first thing tomorrow, so it will definately be fine
for Monday.
Apart from that, it i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm glad you raised this Ara, there are a couple of different
things I've been speculating about here:
(1) An isDirty() interceptor callback, to allow an application to
implement its own dirty checking algorithm
(2) A new property attribute; update="never|auto", to
You'll probably also be happy with the new refresh() method in
Hibernate2 then, I imagine ;)
> I'd love to see #2, since there are quite a few things in my system that
> gets update by triggers, and I've been quite worried that these fields
> might get overwritten. #1 and #3 are nice to haves, b
Patches item #662319, was opened at 2003-01-05 07:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=662319&group_id=40712
Category: Codegen
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Max R. Andersen (maxcsaucdk)
Assigned t
Patches item #670213, was opened at 2003-01-18 20:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=670213&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Simon Harris (haruki_zaemon)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Bugs item #672639, was opened at 2003-01-23 06:08
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428708&aid=672639&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simon Harris (haruki_zaemon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Ano
Feature Requests item #673173, was opened at 2003-01-23 08:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428711&aid=673173&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
Patches item #673820, was opened at 2003-01-24 05:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=673820&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ian Booth (ibooth)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Patches item #673820, was opened at 2003-01-24 16:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=673820&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 7
Submitted By: Ian Booth (ibooth)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #672639, was opened at 2003-01-23 06:08
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428708&aid=672639&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simon Harris (haruki_zaemon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Ano
Patches item #670213, was opened at 2003-01-18 20:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=670213&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simon Harris (haruki_zaemon)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Hi!
Just "stumbled" across this "bug"/"missing feature" in the codegenerator.
If the user has defined its own UserType, e.g. DoubleStringType then the
codegenerator actually naively
assumes the property is of type DoubleStringType and not String[] (which is
the case for exactly this situation).
Could anyone (Gavin?) please send me their eclipse configuration as
mentioned in the below mail ?
(im curious to find out why you can ever run unittests from inside eclipse
without failures ...(as eclipse does NOT call the suite() method)
/max
- Original Message -
From: "Max Rydahl Anders
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 03:10:21PM +1100, Gavin King wrote:
> For Hibernate 2, should we add one or both of:
>
> Session.evict(foo); //remove foo from the Session-level cache
> Session.refresh(foo); //reload foo's state from the database
>
> There *would* be some exotic cases (like this one) wher
Patches item #672865, was opened at 2003-01-23 12:22
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=672865&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Mark Woon (unkyaku)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Is it legal to do the following in order to use multiple databases in
the same application?
In the second session-factory element, I'm passing a new url/user/pass
but using the same dialect.
false
true
net.sf.hibernate.dialect.InterbaseDialect
Patches item #670829, was opened at 2003-01-20 09:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=670829&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Locher (mlocher)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anon
Title: RE: [Hibernate] saveOrUpdate()
# > (4) Reintroduce dynamically generated SQL UPDATEs (which only
# > update dirty columns), as an option. I implemented this feature
# > at one stage, but the performance gains were not what you would
# > expect in my tests. However, it is w
Bugs item #672639, was opened at 2003-01-23 06:08
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428708&aid=672639&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simon Harris (haruki_zaemon)
Assigned to: Nobod
Feature Requests item #673173, was opened at 2003-01-23 08:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428711&aid=673173&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 10:30:08AM -0800, Chris Nokleberg wrote:
> So, how about
> query.setTransient(true)?
>
> All objects returned by the query would be transient and not take up
> space in the cache.
Before I forget, if you have setTransient you could also have
query.setReuseInstances(tr
Patches item #670213, was opened at 2003-01-18 20:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=670213&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 7
Submitted By: Simon Harris (haruki_zaemon)
Assigned to: Nobody
Feature Requests item #673173, was opened at 2003-01-23 08:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428711&aid=673173&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
Patches item #672865, was opened at 2003-01-23 12:22
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=672865&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 6
Submitted By: Mark Woon (unkyaku)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymou
Feature Requests item #673173, was opened at 2003-01-24 03:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428711&aid=673173&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
> (1) An isDirty() interceptor callback, to allow an application to
> implement its own dirty checking algorithm
Good idea. In some case simple equals() is not enough. Let the
application have some sort of control, if needed.
> (2) A new property attribute; update="never|auto", to declare
>
Patches item #670829, was opened at 2003-01-20 09:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428710&aid=670829&group_id=40712
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Locher (mlocher)
Assigned to: Nob
28 matches
Mail list logo
