if this is available
for other word processors (e.g. the free OpenOffice) but wouldn't be surprised.
Roger Moretz, Ph.D., (ret.)
- Original Message
From: Vanessa Avalos vava...@allergydermatology.com
To: HISTONET LISTS histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Thu, March 18, 2010 2:17:05 PM
Subject
as usual for
mouse tissue (if it works for mouse liver, it will work for the eyes).
Roger Moretz, Ph.D. (ret.)
- Original Message
From: Durden, Kelley kelleydur...@pathology.ufl.edu
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Mon, November 23, 2009
First of all, that's not even a word. Secondly, that's not the way it's done.
I'm sure others will point you in the right direction.
Roger Moretz, Ph.D. (ret.)
- Original Message
From: eileen dusek eileen_du...@yahoo.com
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Thu, November 19
In my experience you are way over processing the tissue. Drop your processing
times to about 30 min per station. That should be fine.
Roger Moretz, Ph.D. (ret)
- Original Message
From: Michelle MacVeigh-Aloni macve...@usc.edu
To: Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Tuesday
Your schedule should be fine for any large tissue, and actually seems a bit
overlong for mouse. But if it works, it works.
Roger Moretz, ret.
- Original Message
From: Danielle Crippen dcrip...@buckinstitute.org
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 4:41:44
