Re: [Histonet] Histonet Digest, Vol 140, Issue 5

2015-07-07 Thread Simmons, Christopher
Thanks for citing the article I helped participate in! Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 7, 2015, at 2:25 PM, Terri Braud wrote: > > > In the article reference below, they estimate tissue loss at 7%. In my lab, > our pathologists would croak if we had tissue loss at this high of a rate. > But

Re: [Histonet] Histonet Digest, Vol 140, Issue 5

2015-07-07 Thread Terri Braud
In the article reference below, they estimate tissue loss at 7%. In my lab, our pathologists would croak if we had tissue loss at this high of a rate. But with that said, we do have a 0.8% "loss of tissue". Without exception, they have been extremely small pieces that could have been mucous,

Re: [Histonet] Histonet Digest, Vol 140, Issue 5 specimens lost

2015-07-07 Thread Steve McClain
Steven, The problems associated with tissues lost are quite similar to those with floaters. Here is a newly edited copy of what I posted a few years ago on floaters and you may find it useful. We still wrap nearly all specimens. At times we cannot see minute flakes of tissue, but retrieve them

Re: [Histonet] Histonet Digest, Vol 140, Issue 5

2015-07-07 Thread Kevin Bennett
Alkaline Phosphatse bubbles Hi Tim, Use Dako ultramount. The bubbles are caused by the naphthyl breaking down and releasing CO2 under the coverslip. Apply small amount of the ultramount to cover the muscle tissue and bake in 65 degree oven of 15 to 20 minutes. If you bake it too long the myofibers