[mailto:ste...@mcclainlab.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 1:47 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Histonet Digest, Vol 140, Issue 6 Specimen loss
My goodness 7% tissue loss is ridiculous.
What fool published that?
A 0.8% loss of tissue is beyond me.
Would any one advertise
., A.S., HTL(ASCP)
-Original Message-
From: Steve McClain [mailto:ste...@mcclainlab.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:53 AM
To: Blazek, Linda; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Histonet Digest, Vol 140, Issue 6 Specimen loss
Ms. Blazek,
To clarify the matter, I read
, 2015 10:47 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Histonet Digest, Vol 140, Issue 6 Specimen loss
My goodness 7% tissue loss is ridiculous.
What fool published that?
A 0.8% loss of tissue is beyond me.
Would any one advertise in the local paper that your center
Steve,
I totally agree that 7% tissue loss is extremely high.
Saying that when you have an experienced pathologist that looks at a specimen
and only sees mucoid material he knows that it is most likely that the reagents
in the processor are going to dissolve it.
We have a very low rate of loss,
@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Histonet Digest, Vol 140, Issue 6 Specimen loss
whoa! 7% of specimens? Working in a high volume colonoscopy laboratory for 4
years, I've only had two specimens that were so minute there was nothing at
embedding. Bio-wraps or lens paper is a must
Digest, Vol 140, Issue 6 Specimen loss
My goodness 7% tissue loss is ridiculous.
What fool published that?
A 0.8% loss of tissue is beyond me.
Would any one advertise in the local paper that your center of excellence lab
loses nearly 1% of your specimens?
possibly too small to survive processing
