Gary Martin, I'd be very interested in knowing what response you get to your presentation. I'm certainly available by e-mail if anybody wants to know more.
Remember when you copy my note to include the comment about coverslipping which I posted later. I'd add further: The pathologist's task in reviewing the slides is to correlate the patient's history, the microscopic appearance of the blood smear, and the blood count data, in order to produce a consultation report useful to the attending physician in caring for the patient. Bob Richmond Samurai Pathologist Knoxville TN rsrichm...@gmail.com ************************************************** From: "Martin, Gary" <gmar...@marshallmedical.org> Subject: [Histonet] RE: Histonet Digest, Vol 88, Issue 39 To: <histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu> Thanks to everyone who responded to my request for information concerning peripheral smear review. It seems that most respondents are doing this the way we presently do. I have to say that I agree totally with Dr. Richmond's method. I will be presenting the idea that these slides are "consults" not just a tech issue. Many thanks Gary (in California) _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
