a monopoly. Let's
revolt. Seems to be catching on in the Middle East.
Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Angela Bitting"
To: "Diana McCaig" ; "Greg Dobbin" ;
; "Joyce Weems"
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 10:42 AM
Subject: RE: [Histonet]
e-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Greg
Dobbin
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 09:15
To: Diana McCaig; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] negative controls on immunos
Yes, it is always best to run ever
Behalf Of Greg
Dobbin
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 09:15
To: Diana McCaig; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] negative controls on immunos
Yes, it is always best to run every conceivable control available. Then
you can be really, really, really sure. However, if you have practical
issues that
@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Greg Dobbin
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 09:15
To: Diana McCaig; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] negative controls on immunos
Yes, it is always best to run every conceivable control available. Then
Yes, it is always best to run every conceivable control available. Then you can
be really, really, really sure. However, if you have practical issues that come
into play such as cost of reagents, or extra controls taking up valuable space
on the stainer then you might have to think about what yo
If you do a run of several immunos today and you run a negative control,
and there is a request for additional immunos tomorrow, would you run
another negative control with the additional slides. They are being
stained on a stainer and not manually,
diana
_
