To
'Joe Nocito' jnoc...@satx.rr.com, Histonet
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
cc
Subject
RE: [?? Probable Spam] [Histonet] New CAP grossing guidelines
But above that after the education piece it says in Addition.
Jan, Omaha
-Original Message-
From: Joe Nocito [mailto:jnoc
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 11:41 AM
To: Janice A Mahoney; kim.dona...@bhcpns.org;
histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Cc: Histonet; 'Joe Nocito'
Subject: RE: [?? Probable Spam] [Histonet] New CAP grossing guidelines
Just talked to Jim at CAP and he said the term Processing still can
A janice.maho...@alegent.org
Sent by: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
03/31/2010 04:10 PM
To
'Joe Nocito' jnoc...@satx.rr.com, Histonet
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
cc
Subject
RE: [?? Probable Spam] [Histonet] New CAP grossing guidelines
But above that after the education piece
just had a lively discussion at work. My take is that the only thing CAP
changed was that they combined the processing and grossing pieces
together again, which I don't know why they split them in the first place.
But you don't have the entire CAP note and many people miss this. The last
item
But above that after the education piece it says in Addition.
Jan, Omaha
-Original Message-
From: Joe Nocito [mailto:jnoc...@satx.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:08 PM
To: Mahoney,Janice A; Histonet
Subject: Re: [?? Probable Spam] [Histonet] New CAP grossing guidelines
just had
