We demoed them both and all of us liked the Leica cryostat better. But then again, we are not a Mohs lab.
Beatrice DeBrosse-Serra Pathology Scientist Pfizer Global Research & Development CB4, 2150 10646 Science Center Drive San Diego, CA 92121 Phone# 858-622-5986 Fax# 858-678-8290 -----Original Message----- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Bauer, Karen L. Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 9:52 AM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] Microm vs Leica Hello, We are starting up a new Mohs lab and there have been discussions on what brand of cryostat to purchase. The new doc would like us to get Microm cryostats, but I would like to stick with the Leica, since we us them in the Histology lab and know and trust them. They have been workhorses for us and very reliable. What is the opinion of other Mohs techs out there? Any major differences? Is one really superior to the other? Any comments on this matter is appreciated. Thank you, Karen Karen L. Bauer HTL (ASCP) Histology Section Chief Department of Pathology - Luther Hospital Luther Midelfort - Mayo Health System 715-838-3205 bauer.ka...@mayo.edu _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet