Thanks to everyone that responded to my question. It has encouraged a nice discussion and I have learned from it.
Martha Ward, MT (ASCP) QIHC Manager Molecular Diagnostics Lab Medical Center Boulevard \ Winston-Salem, NC 27157 p 336.716.2109 \ f 336.716.5890 mw...@wakehealth.edu -----Original Message----- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Richmond Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 1:56 PM To: Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] Re: Minimum sample size for breast markers Pathologists need to be very ready to note that a breast cancer sample size is small, and that the markers need to be repeated on the lumpectomy or mastectomy specimen. This is easier said than done. Popping a Dolly-size breast into too-small container and dribbling a little formalin on it is not going to preserve the specimen adequately. Even with a moderate-sized lumpectomy specimen the formaldehyde penetration is going to be chancy. This is an issue that surgeons, OR nurses, and too many pathologists are unable to understand. The pathologist has to arrange to receive the specimen promptly and get the tumor cut into formalin. Easier said than done. The woman's cancer care depends on this getting done. It's non-trivial. And colon cancer is distinctly the next frontier for this problem. Bob Richmond Samurai Pathologist Maryville TN _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
