PM's wife says burqa is a 'symbol of oppression'

War on terrorism: Human Rights

By Marie Woolf, Chief Political Correspondent

20 November 2001

Cherie Booth, the Prime Minister's wife, strode into the political spotlight on Monday to voice her anger at the denial of "basic human rights" to women in Afghanistan.

At a press conference in Downing Street, Ms Booth, a human rights lawyer, railed against the treatment of women under the Taliban, and denounced the wearing of the burqa. Wearing nail varnish was an offence punishable by the removal of a woman's fingernails, she said, adding: "Nothing more symbolises the oppression of women than the burqa, which is a very visible sign of the role of women in Afghanistan."

But her sharply worded comments upset some Islamic leaders, who urged the West to concentrate on the struggle of everyday life in the shattered country, rather than the sartorial restrictions on its women. The way of life of women in Afghanistan was a complex matter ill-suited to public pronouncements by politicians or their spouses, they suggested.

Ms Booth has avoided the public eye since her husband's landslide election win in 1997, rarely giving public backing to government measures. But flanked by Clare Short and Estelle Morris, the Secretaries of State for International Development and Education, Ms Booth said she had been motivated by reading of the erosion of women's rights and meeting women who had been victims of the Taliban regime.

Ms Booth, a QC and Crown Court recorder, said that, in all her years of experience in human rights, she could not recall "repression or cruelty quite as horrifying as that the Taliban regime have imposed on the people of Afghanistan.

"We all know that the Taliban is a regime that denies all its citizens even the most basic of human rights, and for women that is particularly acute," she said. Her condemnation mirrors that of Laura Bush, who on Saturday became the first wife of a United States president to give a solo address to the nation, during which she spoke of the Taliban's "brutal oppression" of women.

Responding to the comments, leading British Muslims warned well-intentioned Westerners to be sensitive about Islamic customs and to avoid meddling. The Muslim Council of Britain said the issue of the burqa was not a priority in Afghanistan when the entire infrastructure had been destroyed. Ensuring people were fed during the winter and had access to medicine were more important issues than what women were wearing.

The council believes putting female teachers back into the classroom and ensuring women have medical care would be more important gestures to the Afghani people than making pronouncements on the burqa. Inayat Bungla-wala, the council's spokesman, said: "Initially we should concentrate on more urgent matters than dress. The fact is that people in Afghanistan don't have a health service and have one of the highest mortality rates ... The West should be paying less attention to dress and more to these issues.

"Wearing a burqa is a women's choice that should be respected, but we agree that there should be no coercion."

Under Islamic law women are required to cover their head with a scarf or hijab. But most Islamic scholars say that the full veil or niqab – the most extreme version of which is the burqa – is not compulsory, and cannot be imposed by men.

At yesterday's media event at No 10, Afghani women wearing sober suits explained to Ms Booth how stifling the burqa was to wear. Two teachers also told how they were driven out of their jobs when the Taliban stopped girls attending school and closed 63 girls' schools when they took power in 1996.

 

Kirim email ke