[HAPI-devel] Fwd: Re: MLLP r1 / MLLP r2 ?

2011-08-05 Thread Rahul Somasunderam
On 08/05/2011 12:32 PM, Erik Gfesser wrote: Rahul, Is a 1-byte ack/nack the only differentiator that release 2 provides? I'm not 100% sure, but that's what I made from the documents. The r2 doc says: In this release the MLLP Message Transport protocol has been extended by commit acknowledgem

Re: [HAPI-devel] MLLP r1 / MLLP r2 ?

2011-08-05 Thread Erik Gfesser
Rahul, Is a 1-byte ack/nack the only differentiator that release 2 provides? Does anyone happen to know how industry usage compares between the 2? Thanks, Erik From: Rahul Somasunderam To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, August 5, 2011 2:03

Re: [HAPI-devel] MLLP r1 / MLLP r2 ?

2011-08-05 Thread Rahul Somasunderam
Just r1. I guess you are interested in the 1 byte ACK/NACK. R, rahul On 08/05/2011 10:41 AM, Boal, Thomas (N-TEK SYSTEMS GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC) wrote: Hi, Does HAPI support MLLP release 1 (http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public_temp_0C52EAA1-1C23-BA17-0C104601C15779CC/wg/inm/mllp_transport

[HAPI-devel] MLLP r1 / MLLP r2 ?

2011-08-05 Thread Boal, Thomas (N-TEK SYSTEMS GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC)
Hi, Does HAPI support MLLP release 1 (http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public_temp_0C52EAA1-1C23-BA17-0C104601C15779CC/wg/inm/mllp_transport_specification.PDF ) or MLLP Release 2 (http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot/html/infrastructure/transport/transport-mllp.html ) or both ? Thanks, Tom Boal