Re: [HAPI-devel] Fwd: HAPI and SSL

akes sense? >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> -Niranjan. >> >> >> >> *From:* Jaime Hablutzel Egoavil [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2009 1:47 PM >> *To:* hl7a

Re: [HAPI-devel] Fwd: HAPI and SSL

[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2009 1:47 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [HAPI-devel] Fwd: HAPI and SSL > > > > thank you Niranjan, but what facities can I use to implement user > authorization? is the a hl7 specific mess

Re: [HAPI-devel] Fwd: HAPI and SSL

, 2009 1:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HAPI-devel] Fwd: HAPI and SSL thank you Niranjan, but what facities can I use to implement user authorization? is the a hl7 specific message to manage authentication? regards. On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Sharma, Niranjan K

Re: [HAPI-devel] Fwd: HAPI and SSL

excersize..implement ServerSocket call into > SSL socket . This is in TransportLayer domains. > > Have a look at it. > > > > *From:* Jaime Hablutzel Egoavil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2009 10:34 PM > *To:* [email protected] >

Re: [HAPI-devel] Fwd: HAPI and SSL

: [HAPI-devel] Fwd: HAPI and SSL I can realize that some of you are using web services for message transportation, but... is this the best?? doesn't it add an unnecesary level of complexity? I can realize that HAPI has a message transport implementation. I would like to know all alternatives b

[HAPI-devel] Fwd: HAPI and SSL

I can realize that some of you are using web services for message transportation, but... is this the best?? doesn't it add an unnecesary level of complexity? I can realize that HAPI has a message transport implementation. I would like to know all alternatives before getting into production at the