[hlds] Re: [hlds_announce] Counter-Strike: Source update released

2005-03-10 Thread Bud Ingram
I checked to see if sv_max_queries_sec, sv_max_queries_sec_global, and sv_max_queries_window were valid command, they do not appear to work on Win32 (unless my HLDSUPDATETOOL is just not updating... I watched it run today at 8:15 AM CST and saw no additional downloads from early this AM @

Re: [hlds] Counter-Strike: Source update released

2005-03-10 Thread wArgOd
Alfred Reynolds wrote: We have released an update to Counter-Strike: Source. Run the hldsupdatetool to get the it. Very smooth update Alfred. Thank you. Any prediction on when an update for the Win32 platform will be released that contains all the features mentioned in the steam news update?

Re: [hlds] Firewall Woes

2005-03-10 Thread DLinkOZ
I see that you have all outbound enabled by default, correct? For my own firewall which allows outgoing, I only had to define incoming ports 27015 and 27020 (tcp or udp, where appropriate). - Original Message - From: BlackYoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Sent:

RE: [hlds] Counter-Strike: Source update released

2005-03-10 Thread Alfred Reynolds
This update is now released (the dedicated server now has the stats command and the connectionless query rate limiting functionality). - Alfred -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred Reynolds Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:22 AM To:

[hlds] stats after update

2005-03-10 Thread Kevin Cantrell
CPU InOut Uptime Users FPSPlayers 0.00 12438.39 13178.05 26 0 57.69 7 above is a copy/paste from the server console the fields look normal when no one is on the server, but above is a list with only 7 people on, as you can see the results do not match up with

Re: [hlds] stats after update

2005-03-10 Thread Whisper
CPU InOut Uptime Users FPSPlayers 59.38 87.12 121.85 622 212 249.00 14 Thats a ping boosted server CS 1.6 Death Match Server sv_maxrate 2 sv_maxupdaterate 130 On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:24:54 -0800 (PST), Kevin Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CPU InOut