lol @ hotmail users.

2008/9/12 Peter stadeager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> please stop sending mails to me> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: hlds 
> Digest, Vol 7, Issue 18> To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 
> 2008 20:24:53 -0700> > Send hlds mailing list submissions to> 
> hlds@list.valvesoftware.com> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide 
> Web, visit> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds> or, via 
> email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 
> You can reach the person managing the list at> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > When 
> replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific> than "Re: 
> Contents of hlds digest..."> > > Today's Topics:> > 1. Give me a general idea 
> on quad cores (Luke Lewis)> 2. Re: Give me a general idea on quad cores 
> (Nephyrin Zey)> 3. Re: Give me a general idea on quad cores ([??R] 
> The-/<iller)> 4. Re: Give me a general idea on quad cores (Luke Lewis)> 5. 
> Re: Give me a general idea on quad cores (Gary Stanley)> 6. Re: Give me a 
> general idea on quad cores (Cc2iscooL)> 7. Re: Give me a general idea on quad 
> cores (Luke Lewis)> 8. Re: Give me a general idea on quad cores (Chris 
> Staley)> 9. Re: Give me a general idea on quad cores (Mike Stiehm)> 10. Re: 
> Give me a general idea on quad cores (Luke Lewis)> > > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------> > 
> Message: 1> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:16:56 -0500> From: "Luke Lewis" <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]>> Subject: [hlds] Give me a general idea on quad cores> To: 
> "'Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list'"> 
> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Content-Type: 
> text/plain; charset="us-ascii"> > I currently have a dual Xeon 2.8 machine, 
> and I have added a Xeon Quad core> to the mix it's a Xeon 3210 (2.1Ghz I 
> believe) What kind of performance can> I expect from this box compared to my 
> current Dual 2.8? The current 2.8 is> the old netburst style single core HT 
> enabled if that matters much.> > I run a fairly small community with 2 CS 
> servers, 1 COD4, and 1 TF2. I know> some of you guys have to have this box. 
> Thanks in advance for the advice,> opinions, or general help!> > -BeNt-> > > 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature> 
> database 3436 (20080911) __________> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 
> Antivirus.> > http://www.eset.com> > > > > > ------------------------------> 
> > Message: 2> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:37:22 -0700> From: "Nephyrin Zey" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Subject: Re: [hlds] Give me a general idea on quad 
> cores> To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"> 
> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>> Message-ID:> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8> > I have a Xeon 3210 Server. Running 
> linux x64, I can run one 32x TF2> server per core with SourceTV enabled and 
> get decent FPS. It uses> nearly 100% of a core though :(. Turning off 
> SourceTV and some of the> 'boosting' hax I use, the same 32x server uses like 
> 60-80% of a core> generally.> > - Neph> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:16 PM, 
> Luke Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > I currently have a dual Xeon 2.8 
> machine, and I have added a Xeon Quad core> > to the mix it's a Xeon 3210 
> (2.1Ghz I believe) What kind of performance can> > I expect from this box 
> compared to my current Dual 2.8? The current 2.8 is> > the old netburst style 
> single core HT enabled if that matters much.> >> > I run a fairly small 
> community with 2 CS servers, 1 COD4, and 1 TF2. I know> > some of you guys 
> have to have this box. Thanks in advance for the advice,> > opinions, or 
> general help!> >> > -BeNt-> >> >> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 
> Antivirus, version of virus signature> > database 3436 (20080911) __________> 
> >> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.> >> > 
> http://www.eset.com> >> >> >> > 
> _______________________________________________> > To unsubscribe, edit your 
> list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:> > 
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds> >> > > > 
> ------------------------------> > Message: 3> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:58:30 
> -0400> From: "[??R] The-/<iller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Subject: Re: [hlds] 
> Give me a general idea on quad cores> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server 
> mailing list> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed> > Dunno about your 
> other specs but we did the same thing almost and went > from 1x32 dods 1x24 
> css and 2x32 tf2 to 2x32 dods 1x24 css 2x32 tf2 1x24 > tf2 1x13 tf2(with tv) 
> and even when theyre all full only get about 90% > usage with pretty good 
> tick rates still on full load> > Luke Lewis wrote:> > I currently have a dual 
> Xeon 2.8 machine, and I have added a Xeon Quad core> > to the mix it's a Xeon 
> 3210 (2.1Ghz I believe) What kind of performance can> > I expect from this 
> box compared to my current Dual 2.8? The current 2.8 is> > the old netburst 
> style single core HT enabled if that matters much.> >> > I run a fairly small 
> community with 2 CS servers, 1 COD4, and 1 TF2. I know> > some of you guys 
> have to have this box. Thanks in advance for the advice,> > opinions, or 
> general help!> >> > -BeNt-> > > >> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 
> Antivirus, version of virus signature> > database 3436 (20080911) __________> 
> >> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.> >> > 
> http://www.eset.com> > > >> >> > 
> _______________________________________________> > To unsubscribe, edit your 
> list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:> > 
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds> >> > > > > > > 
> ------------------------------> > Message: 4> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:28:13 
> -0500> From: "Luke Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Subject: Re: [hlds] Give me a 
> general idea on quad cores> To: "'Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing 
> list'"> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"> > Yeah most people I have 
> talked to say they run at least as well if not a lot> better than the Dual 
> Xeon 2.8 and 3.2 machines. I'm waiting now for them to> send me my email to 
> access the server. The plan is if it runs better the 2.8> box will be going 
> down. So I suppose it's safe to say then that the box> should hold 2x12 + 
> 1x24 CS 1.6, 1x32 COD4, and 1x24 TF2? The box we are on> now(Dual 2.8) has 2 
> GB of ram 100mbit connection windows 2003. Same setup> with the new server 
> just different processor, and better ram/harddrives.> > -----Original 
> Message-----> On Behalf Of "[??R] The-/<iller"> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 
> 2008 6:59 PM> > Dunno about your other specs but we did the same thing almost 
> and went > from 1x32 dods 1x24 css and 2x32 tf2 to 2x32 dods 1x24 css 2x32 
> tf2 1x24 > tf2 1x13 tf2(with tv) and even when theyre all full only get about 
> 90% > usage with pretty good tick rates still on full load> > > > > 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature> 
> database 3436 (20080911) __________> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 
> Antivirus.> > http://www.eset.com> > > > > > ------------------------------> 
> > Message: 5> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:38:03 -0400> From: Gary Stanley 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Subject: Re: [hlds] Give me a general idea on quad 
> cores> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list> 
> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>, "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server> mailing 
> list" <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>> Message-ID:> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed> > At 07:37 PM 
> 9/11/2008, Nephyrin Zey wrote:> >I have a Xeon 3210 Server. Running linux 
> x64, I can run one 32x TF2> >server per core with SourceTV enabled and get 
> decent FPS. It uses> >nearly 100% of a core though :(. Turning off SourceTV 
> and some of the> >'boosting' hax I use, the same 32x server uses like 60-80% 
> of a core> >generally.> > I have a rough patch that reduces how expensive 
> gettimeofday() is, > but that doesn't help how expensive the engine is.> > 
> Could you do some kernel profiling to see what the engine is spending > most 
> of it's time doing?> > > > > > ------------------------------> > Message: 6> 
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:22:10 -0500> From: Cc2iscooL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
> Subject: Re: [hlds] Give me a general idea on quad cores> To: Half-Life 
> dedicated Win32 server mailing list> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>> 
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Content-Type: text/plain; 
> charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed> > I hope you have a lot of bandwidth. :)> 
> > Luke Lewis wrote:> > Yeah most people I have talked to say they run at 
> least as well if not a lot> > better than the Dual Xeon 2.8 and 3.2 machines. 
> I'm waiting now for them to> > send me my email to access the server. The 
> plan is if it runs better the 2.8> > box will be going down. So I suppose 
> it's safe to say then that the box> > should hold 2x12 + 1x24 CS 1.6, 1x32 
> COD4, and 1x24 TF2? The box we are on> > now(Dual 2.8) has 2 GB of ram 
> 100mbit connection windows 2003. Same setup> > with the new server just 
> different processor, and better ram/harddrives.> >> > -----Original 
> Message-----> > On Behalf Of "[??R] The-/<iller"> > Sent: Thursday, September 
> 11, 2008 6:59 PM> >> > Dunno about your other specs but we did the same thing 
> almost and went > > from 1x32 dods 1x24 css and 2x32 tf2 to 2x32 dods 1x24 
> css 2x32 tf2 1x24 > > tf2 1x13 tf2(with tv) and even when theyre all full 
> only get about 90% > > usage with pretty good tick rates still on full load> 
> >> >> > > >> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of 
> virus signature> > database 3436 (20080911) __________> >> > The message was 
> checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.> >> > http://www.eset.com> > > >> >> > 
> _______________________________________________> > To unsubscribe, edit your 
> list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:> > 
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds> > > > > > 
> ------------------------------> > Message: 7> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:49:19 
> -0500> From: "Luke Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Subject: Re: [hlds] Give me a 
> general idea on quad cores> To: "'Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing 
> list'"> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"> > 100mbit connection with 
> 2500GB should do it ;)> > -----Original Message-----> From: [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL> Sent: Thursday, 
> September 11, 2008 8:22 PM> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing 
> list> Subject: Re: [hlds] Give me a general idea on quad cores> > I hope you 
> have a lot of bandwidth. :)> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 
> Antivirus, version of virus signature> database 3436 (20080911) __________> > 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.> > http://www.eset.com> > > 
> > > > ------------------------------> > Message: 8> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 
> 21:08:08 -0500> From: Chris Staley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Subject: Re: [hlds] 
> Give me a general idea on quad cores> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server 
> mailing list> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed> > sounds like a 
> lot, but we have a lot of customers who eat through that a > lot quicker than 
> they think.. lol> > > Luke Lewis wrote:> > 100mbit connection with 2500GB 
> should do it ;)> >> > -----Original Message-----> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL> > Sent: Thursday, 
> September 11, 2008 8:22 PM> > To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing 
> list> > Subject: Re: [hlds] Give me a general idea on quad cores> >> > I hope 
> you have a lot of bandwidth. :)> >> > > >> > __________ Information from ESET 
> NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature> > database 3436 (20080911) 
> __________> >> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.> >> > 
> http://www.eset.com> > > >> >> > 
> _______________________________________________> > To unsubscribe, edit your 
> list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:> > 
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds> > > > > > 
> ------------------------------> > Message: 9> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:43:18 
> -0500> From: Mike Stiehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Subject: Re: [hlds] Give me a 
> general idea on quad cores> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing 
> list> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes> > I run 
> a quad core server and I go way over 2500G> > iPhone> > On Sep 11, 2008, at 
> 8:49 PM, "Luke Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:> > > 100mbit connection 
> with 2500GB should do it ;)> >> > -----Original Message-----> > From: [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL> > Sent: 
> Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:22 PM> > To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server 
> mailing list> > Subject: Re: [hlds] Give me a general idea on quad cores> >> 
> > I hope you have a lot of bandwidth. :)> >> >> >> > __________ Information 
> from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > > signature> > database 3436 
> (20080911) __________> >> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.> 
> >> > http://www.eset.com> >> >> >> > 
> _______________________________________________> > To unsubscribe, edit your 
> list preferences, or view the list > > archives, please visit:> > 
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds> > > > 
> ------------------------------> > Message: 10> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 
> 22:24:56 -0500> From: "Luke Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Subject: Re: [hlds] 
> Give me a general idea on quad cores> To: "'Half-Life dedicated Win32 server 
> mailing list'"> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"> > Granted but my 
> server do not stay populated but a couple hours each night.> And the two that 
> do stay populated are CS 1.6. My normal usage on a busy> month is only about 
> 200 GB. So I think in my particular case 2500 will do> it. Now if I could 
> actually get the servers populated to where I would have> to worry about it 
> haha. Thanks again guys!> > -BeNt-> > -----Original Message-----> On Behalf 
> Of Mike Stiehm> Thursday, September 11, 2008 9:43 PM> > > I run a quad core 
> server and I go way over 2500G> > > > > > __________ Information from ESET 
> NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature> database 3436 (20080911) 
> __________> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.> > 
> http://www.eset.com> > > > > > ------------------------------> > 
> _______________________________________________> To unsubscribe, edit your 
> list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:> 
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds> > > > End of hlds 
> Digest, Vol 7, Issue 18> ***********************************
> _________________________________________________________________
> Pimp din egen buddy med buddy Maker
> http://www.messengerplayground.dk/buddymaker
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to