Re: [hlds] [hlds_linux] TF2 srcds CPU experiences

2014-09-23 Thread Kyle Sanderson
> virtualize out all the services You're going to incur more then a double hit from this. The workloads are vastly different as well. Kyle. On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Ryan Stecker wrote: > Thanks for the info! > >>Is there value in running one giant box, rather than getting a second >> ma

Re: [hlds] [hlds_linux] TF2 srcds CPU experiences

2014-09-23 Thread Ryan Stecker
Thanks for the info! >Is there value in running one giant box, rather than getting a second machine? For now it's just an option we're throwing around, if dual 2650v2 turn out to be doable. The goal would be to virtualize out all the services we run (web, db, srcds, etc). The other alternative is

Re: [hlds] [hlds_linux] TF2 srcds CPU experiences

2014-09-22 Thread Anthony Duncan
:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Yun Huang Yong Sent: 23 September 2014 04:55 To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list; Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list Subject: Re: [hlds] [hlds_linux] TF2 srcds CPU experiences We run on a variety of VPS including one wher

Re: [hlds] [hlds_linux] TF2 srcds CPU experiences

2014-09-22 Thread Yun Huang Yong
We run on a variety of VPS including one where the underlying host is an E5-2620. Compared to our other hosts that run 3.4Ghz CPUs we do see higher sv FPS variance but it's not really gameplay affecting (players don't complain). (I believe the 3.4Ghz cores are E3-12xx v3 but I can't be certai