--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Cain, that is exactly how I would put it
Good luck!
On 9/29/05, CAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, for those folks who have never heard how good the Speedx Codec is,
> check
> it out sometime.
>
> It sounds much better and clearer than m
Well, for those folks who have never heard how good the Speedx Codec is, check
it out sometime.
It sounds much better and clearer than my telephone, I would say it sounds
almost as good as a CD for spoken voice, while the default voice codec is very
poor.
I remember Alfred talking about Speex la
k
> like they are the voice codec. Valve pushed this option onto the server op.
>
> --Ozz
>
> -- Forwarded Message: --
> From: CAIN
> To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: [hlds] DODS - Better Voice Quality Codec Available ???
> Date: Wed, 28
n the bin folder. Although I can't find any existing ones that look
like they are the voice codec. Valve pushed this option onto the server op.
--Ozz
-- Forwarded Message: --
From: CAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: [hlds] DOD
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I don't think the codec is bad at all. Sure it isn't thx quality but there
is no reason to make cs:s use even more bandwidth (yeah I am on dial-up)
when it doesn't have to.
Maybe it is just me but I don't see a problem, maybe some should consider
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Ah, yes. I remember that now.
--
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
The license for some open source software requires that any programs using
it must by made open source as well.
On 9/28/05, Dan Stevens (IAmAI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Quote by Alex
- Better Voice Quality Codec Available ???
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Quote by Alex Spencer:
> I wonder if there's some issue with the licensing of speex (given it's
> open source nature)
Surely, if it is open sourece, there should be no problem
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Quote by Alex Spencer:
> I wonder if there's some issue with the licensing of speex (given it's
> open source nature)
Surely, if it is open sourece, there should be no problems with licensing?
--
___
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Welcome to Source
The Short answer is No
Perhaps the DoD community will have better success at having this changed
than the CS community has for the past 12 months.
On 9/28/05, CAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In good old DoD 1.3 server Admi
People have been asking for this since the release of CS:S, as yet no joy.
I wonder if there's some issue with the licensing of speex (given it's
open source nature)
CAIN wrote:
In good old DoD 1.3 server Admins could use an improved voice quality codec:
sv_voicecodec voice_speex
sv_voicequal
In good old DoD 1.3 server Admins could use an improved voice quality codec:
sv_voicecodec voice_speex
sv_voicequality 5
Using this codec makes the spoken voices crystal clear.
Unfortunately DODS has reverted to the old default Voice Codec from HL1, and it
is garbled and very poor quality. I'm
12 matches
Mail list logo
