um, read. i said ive done it. i cant see it. stop being a dickhead and
just tell us.
On 6/1/05, Clayton Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nah, that's ok. I lose interest when those involved refuse to expend
> any energy and want even the simplest things done for them.
>
> On 6/1/05, Maarten van
nah, that's ok. I lose interest when those involved refuse to expend
any energy and want even the simplest things done for them.
On 6/1/05, Maarten van der Zwaart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are not contributing anything here. Either post what it is, or just
> stop repeating the same thing ov
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:33:49PM -0700, Clayton Macleod wrote:
> I don't know why this has to be stated so many times, it affects MORE
> than just the SKY. And in all this time of asking the same question
> over and over and ignoring the answers you could have SEEN FOR
> YOURSELF what is changed
This is not a server issue.
You are trying to get better performance on your client.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of m1kest4r
Sent: 31. mai 2005 14:11
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] r_3dsky
dunno jordan, typically
dunno jordan, typically i get about 40fps better instantly with it
off. im not sure about you but 40fps more is more than what i need. i
dont exactly spend my time looking at the sky when im playing.
secondly clayton...its not easy to find something when you have NO
CLUE what your looking for. jus
This thread is hilariousily offtopic, just give the poor kid some
screenshots already or ignore him..
Anyway, because I cannot resist, without having seen any gameplay
advantages in r_3dsky myself ... I'd guess if I were one to justify the
decision it would be for the following reasons
1. It mak
seen what ?!! ive been looking everywhere for a difference, this
"thing" you keep talking about must be imaginary or something, do us a
favour and take a screenshot or atleast tell us what it is
On 5/31/05, Clayton Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you're right, I keep saying something over and
you're right, I keep saying something over and over even though I
don't know. Yeah, that's it. *sigh* Fact remains you could have easily
seen for yourself by now, several times over.
On 5/31/05, fsjk85 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "too easy." ?, sounds like you dont know :)
--
Clayton Macleod
_
"too easy." ?, sounds like you dont know :)
On 5/31/05, Clayton Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because that would be too easy.
>
> Not to mention the fact that tons of maps have places where players
> can go where the sky is visibile behind them, and if you remove the
> 3dsky then you greatl
Because that would be too easy.
Not to mention the fact that tons of maps have places where players
can go where the sky is visibile behind them, and if you remove the
3dsky then you greatly alter the contrast ratio between background and
player model, giving you a much easier task of picking that
well why dont you do us a favour and tell us what OTHER THAN THE SKY is affected
On 5/31/05, Clayton Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how many times does it have to be said? Things related to this setting
> appear in places OTHER THAN THE SKY.
>
> On 5/31/05, fsjk85 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
how many times does it have to be said? Things related to this setting
appear in places OTHER THAN THE SKY.
On 5/31/05, fsjk85 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> block your view of what ?, anything that is part of a 3dsky appears as
> it is behind everything, so in anycase, your vision of a player or
>
urself.
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "m1kest4r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 4:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: [hlds] r_3dsky
> >
> >
> > > Thanks clayton, im well aware it turns
.
Not seeing things that might normaly block your view is not cheating?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of m1kest4r
Sent: 31. mai 2005 07:16
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] r_3dsky
right ive already done that
bind one key to turn it on and one key to turn it off. Run around the
maps flicking back and forth. Ignore the sky area.
On 5/30/05, m1kest4r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> right ive already done that (previously, several times) and if your
> talking about tops of buildings / palm trees dissapearing
blatently obvious.
- Original Message -
From: "m1kest4r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 31 May, 2005 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] r_3dsky
right ive already done that (previously, several times) and if your
talking about tops of buildings / palm trees dissapearing then h
MAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 4:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds] r_3dsky
>
>
> > Thanks clayton, im well aware it turns the 3d sky off. but why is this
> > a "cheat". Thanks dagok but you see i wasnt satisified with the
> > replies of the olde
3dsky affects more than the sky?
thats what im asking.
On 5/31/05, Dagok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This was already discussed this past weekend, look back at older threads.
r_3dsky affects more than just the sky.
- Original Message -
From: "m1kest4r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know why this has to be stated so many times, it affects MORE
than just the SKY. And in all this time of asking the same question
over and over and ignoring the answers you could have SEEN FOR
YOURSELF what is changed BESIDES the sky by simply starting your own
listen server, as we told you
ing.
On 5/31/05, Dagok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was already discussed this past weekend, look back at older threads.
>
> r_3dsky affects more than just the sky.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "m1kest4r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To
This was already discussed this past weekend, look back at older threads.
r_3dsky affects more than just the sky.
- Original Message -
From: "m1kest4r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 8:18 AM
Subject: [hlds] r_3dsky
failing anyone having a se
heh, it would be faster for you to simply turn it on and look around
on the stock maps. The answer is obvious. But of course that would
require you to actually do something, so, by all means flame away.
On 5/30/05, m1kest4r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> failing anyone having a seriously legimate re
failing anyone having a seriously legimate reason to why this is a
cheat cvar other than some garbage like "look at with sv_cheats 1 on".
can someone please (preferably from valve who actually knows whats
going on rather than making crappy assumptions) explain to me why this
is a cheat cvar. this
23 matches
Mail list logo
