Re: [hlds] -heapsize

2006-06-21 Thread Kevin Ottalini
There was a heapsize discussion recently on the Linux email list (but I did testing on Win32) that has this information: http://www.mail-archive.com/hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com/msg40650.html Summary: best practice is to leave it alone (IE: don't use it) Using it will not improve the perf

Re: [hlds] -heapsize

2006-06-21 Thread Hell Phoenix
I thought you left this list after the last flamefest? =p Bush wrote: I could be wrong, but I think -heapsize is only for client side, not server side. I'm sure someone else on this list can either confirm or deny that. Enjoy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P

RE: [hlds] -heapsize

2006-06-21 Thread Bush
I could be wrong, but I think -heapsize is only for client side, not server side. I'm sure someone else on this list can either confirm or deny that. Enjoy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spectre Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 7:53 AM To:

RE: [hlds] heapsize?

2005-08-09 Thread Rick Payton
Kilobytes So for a "true" 128 meg heapsize you would specify 131072 (1024*128) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sprout Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 2:10 PM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [hlds] heapsize? This is a multi-part me