Behalf Of RMaioroff
> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 2:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [hlds] Lag with Bots on 100 Tick CSS ?
>
> No, I don't think he did... Anyway, my point wasn't to start a debate on
> task manager, but to suggest a different approach to
You can also assign scrds a higher priority in task manager.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RMaioroff
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 2:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Lag with Bots on 100 Tick CSS ?
No, I don't thi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin Tuft
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Lag with Bots on 100 Tick CSS ?
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
That is true the one bar graph does show the total CPU usage percent, but
come on, if y
r
hard to miss one CPU sitting at a 100% and the rest sitting at 4-8%.
Did he ever say how many CPU's/Core's he has?
Dustin Tuft
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [hlds] Lag with
> Bots on 100 Tick CSS ?> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:54:44
be using 90% or more, which is reflected in
the results of running STAT.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roman Hatsiev
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Lag with Bots on 100 Tick CSS ?
I wonder
is reflected in
the results of running STAT.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roman Hatsiev
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Lag with Bots on 100 Tick CSS ?
I wonder what makes you think that in
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Heh
Guys, you are all well aware that SRCDS fps can die in the arse without
showing a proportionate increase in CPU usage.
You have all seen it, double didgit fps numbers with low CPU usage at
exactly the same time according to "rcon stats" and
I wonder what makes you think that in-game CPU stats are more accurate
than those provided by standard OS utility?
On 13/04/07, RMaioroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How are you making the determination that your CPU is not suffering from
high load? You may already know this, but the windows task
Is this a multi CPU / multi core machine? If so I suspect
your not understanding the way taskmaanger displays usage
and hence one of the cores / cpu's is in fact maxed out
which would explain your lag.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "leo bounds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have been spen
I don't know if it works the same way on Src servers and hld servers but on my
hlds any setting of sys_ticrate (not ticrate) above 66 causes strange behavior
like slow motion bots and bots that won't fall when they die. I know Src and
HLds are two different animals but the common thread is the
How are you making the determination that your CPU is not suffering from
high load? You may already know this, but the windows task-manager is not
going to provide accurate CPU usage for your source server. A more useful /
accurate way to see if you are running out of CPU while the problem happens,
You could be running out of cpu resources. Setting your server to 100 tic
uses a lot of cpu and also bots use a lot of additional CPU.
-maa
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of leo bounds
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
12 matches
Mail list logo
