Eric Smith wrote:
These security modules have several new cheat detections. We're still
working with Transgaming Technologies to fix the problems WineX clients are
having.
Can I ask you, if you personally test HL+WineX at Valve, or just are
informed (quickly) by users?
jerzy szczudlowski wrote:
Can I ask you, if you personally test HL+WineX at Valve, or just are
informed (quickly) by users?
I'll add why not a linux client?, instead off emulating it?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
We've had some reports of problems with the latest VAC security modules and
other third-party applications. We're reverting the security modules while
we look into the problems.
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: Eric Smith
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Half-Life Dedicated
Olivier Doucet [reagi.com] wrote:
Well, I find it strange...
I have a CS 12 slots - pingboost 3 running in a 950Mhz, it takes only 60%
CPU when it's full.
And the machine load is under 0.8
That's why i was thinking that 5 or 6 CS servers wouldn't be a problem...
Remember, CPU usage increases
--
P3s, P4s and a dual Xeon all under RH 7.2 or 7.3, 2.4.x have performed
well for us. I have seen a lot of complaints on 8.0 and up though.
I don't think your problem is the 3.1.1.1.x efficiency issue. We saw a
consistent 20-40% increase in load but nothing strange like what you
describe. It
--
Slightly off topic, but the latest bf1942 linux beta has had some serious
issues (I think this is 99% bf code, rather than linux) but a few did some
serious compile tests, and found that making sure to turn off apm, and smp
in uniprocessor systems, lowered the cpu usage a noticable ammount.
According to the great words of Deacon:
Remember, CPU usage increases almost exponentially for every extra 2
slots over 12 or 14.
Even below 12, it increases exponentially as you add players, it's just
that it is so low that it's not really noticable.
-Mad
--
A proof is a proof. What kind of
It also depends on how many are rarely used priv servers. If you have 15
servers running but only 2 at a time are being played on then load will be
fine.
- Original Message -
From: Mad Scientist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:23 PM
Subject: Re:
True, but what happens when 10 of the servers end up having
scrims/matches...then it overloads the server :-\
It also depends on how many are rarely used priv servers. If you have 15
servers running but only 2 at a time are being played on then load will be
fine.
Sorry if this has been covered already, i'm sure it has, I was just
curious APPROXIMETLY how much bandwidth is used by a server that is
semi-full ONLY during the day, like between 9-18 players for 8-9 hours a
day. If you guys could just throw out some guestimates, much 3 Thanks
in advance...plz
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
How do i get a bot set up on my ded server?? I would prefer pod bot but i can settle
for hpb bot, i see people talking about podbot.so on the net but i cant find anywhere
to download it.
Hmm looking at my traffic usage, a full 16 player server on dust and
aztec averages around 35-40Kbyte in and out. Always leave room on your
bandwidth for spikes though, so call my figures 50Kbyte in and out for
16 players.
Cheers,
Scott Pettit
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
The following bots are the ones I know about that run on Linux:
PLBot: http://www.olo.counter-strike.pl/
JoeBot: http://www.joebot.net/index.php
BSDBot: http://gamershomepage.com/csbot/
HPBBot: http://www.planethalflife.com/botman/hpb_bot.shtml
For PODBot try http://podbot.nuclearbox.com/ in the
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I have crashed only a couple times since the beta release of steam
linux. Matter of fact 10 hours before the first one happened, and it
has run longer without a crash after that. Tonight, the game
Hmm looking at my traffic usage, a full 16 player server on dust and
aztec averages around 35-40Kbyte in and out. Always leave room on your
bandwidth for spikes though, so call my figures 50Kbyte in and out for
16 players.
I mean total GB per month, is what I was looking for...
--
Zack Sloane
Hmm looking at my traffic usage, a full 16 player server on dust and
aztec averages around 35-40Kbyte in and out. Always leave room on your
bandwidth for spikes though, so call my figures 50Kbyte in and out for
16 players.
I mean total GB per month, is what I was looking for...
--
Zack Sloane
At Wednesday 10:11 PM 7/2/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Hmm looking at my traffic usage, a full 16 player server on dust and
aztec averages around 35-40Kbyte in and out. Always leave room on your
bandwidth for spikes though, so call my figures 50Kbyte in and out for
16 players.
I mean total GB per
The CS 1.6 beta also contains a bot developed by Valve, details are at:
http://www.turtlerockstudios.com/forums/csbot/viewtopic.php?t=4
http://www.turtlerockstudios.com/forums/csbot/viewtopic.php?t=5
:)
Tristan wrote:
The following bots are the ones I know about that run on Linux:
PLBot:
I used 132GB last month for a 20 player server. That's 6.6GB/player for
the month.
Thanks...answered my question
--
Zack Sloane
http://zteknology.com
AIM: Z teKno1ogy
--
A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a
proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's
19 matches
Mail list logo
