I just copied the .so over from an old linux installation.
Not elegant, but it worked.
-Original Message-
From: Brian A. Stumm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] gearbox directory aka opposing force
There is no
http://www.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=65878goto=newpost
_
Ontvang je Hotmail Messenger berichten op je mobiele telefoon
http://www.msn.nl/communicatie/smsdiensten/hotmailsmsv2/
an empty server
cpu% mem%
24.7 48.4
metamod + amxmod, cs is unplayable without _real_ player management utilities
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 04:40:25PM +, wouter v/d Bergh wrote:
http://www.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=65878goto=newpost
James Clark wrote:
an empty server
cpu% mem%
24.7 48.4
metamod + amxmod, cs is unplayable without _real_ player management utilities
don't forget a _real_ anti-cheater ;D
--
dual_bereta_r0x -- Alexandre Hautequest
ArenaNetwork Lan House Cyber -- www.arenanetwork.com.br
Três anéis para os Reis
They have added nothing to this game since they bought it.
The fact that they decided to control cheating shows how little they
have contributed.
They haven't got a fscking clue.
Matt.
dual_bereta_r0x wrote:
James Clark wrote:
an empty server
cpu% mem%
24.7 48.4
metamod + amxmod, cs is
I forgot to add the numerous remote exploits they have been
lackadaisical about fixing, the numerous viruses they catch and
contaminate the list with, trojans they release their source code with...
Matt Judge wrote:
They have added nothing to this game since they bought it.
The fact that they
I don't doubt that the guys that do the work want to fix all manner of
stuff... it'll be the people that control the purse strings that hold
things up, and coordinate what takes priority over what.
a native linux client would breath some more life into the game, hint
hint =D the ONLY reason I
I would rather they didn't _WASTE_ time on a Linux client.
If you want to play games then stick to Windows.
My main concern is CPU usage. Two years ago I was running 8 servers on a
machine that is now having problems running 4.
I shouldn't complain too much, it's a two year old server but where
If you want to play games then stick to Windows.
No. Fuck that. Why should I _have_ to?
I can play these games under linux:
enemy-territory
ut2004
never winter nights
doom3 (not yet, but JC has said it will happen)
quake3
There is no argument against linux being a viable platform
No. Fuck that. Why should I _have_ to?
It's a waste of developer time.
For the time being I don't think the Linux gamer represents a large
enough percentage of players to spend time and money on, especially on
such an aging game. Use Winex or something.
-Original Message-
From:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:45:18AM -, James Sykes wrote:
No. Fuck that. Why should I _have_ to?
It's a waste of developer time.
Not when it's done from the outset. It also helps find bugs, that may
not have been found otherwise.
For the time being I don't think the Linux gamer
I think it will be a good few years at LEAST before you start seeing
widespread adoption of Linux clients.
As a business decision it is very simple. How much money will it take to
develop an application on Linux and how much money will it make.
Market share Guff? Not basic business sense then?
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
James Sykes wrote:
No. Fuck that. Why should I _have_ to?
It's a waste of developer time.
For the time being I don't think the Linux gamer represents a large
enough percentage of players to
According to the great words of James Sykes:
I would rather they didn't _WASTE_ time on a Linux client.
If you want to play games then stick to Windows.
My version of Windows is no longer supported. Can you send me $200 to
upgrade it so I can play my $20 game?
Thanks!
-Mad
--
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I stopped admining when i was on cs 1.5 but i am back in bizness, and i would like to
know what is the exact name for the parameter named hz
like sv_hz 100 ?
and can i add sys_ticrate into server.cfg
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 07:36:43AM +0100, Blobzor wrote:
and can i add sys_ticrate into server.cfg or it's a command line option ?
sys_ticrate is a normal cvar, you can set it where you want.
Maarten
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or
16 matches
Mail list logo
