You can ignore it.
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
InspectorGifts Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:05 PM To:
hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [hlds_linux] Memory leak
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
L 02/08/2005 - 23:01:40: server_message: "restart"
File /home/---/hlds_source/hl2/NavPlace.db was never closed
File /home/---/hlds_source/hl2/NavPlace.db was never closed
Memory leak: mempool b
Are you using a Linksys Router on that server?
This is a error that the wrong firmware in that router might cause.
- Original Message -
From: Marcel
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 4:21 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] NET_SendPacket ERROR: Invalid argum
Original message from Alfred Reynolds:
> We have reproduced the problem internally and are working on a fix.
Thank you, thank you. This will be a big relief to many of us.
--
Chris
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list ar
Hi,
Thank you for the fast reply.
I also see following "dmesg" messages at many servers:
[...]
UDP: short packet: From xx.xx.xx.xx:27005 46/38 to xx.xx.xx.xx:22200
[...]
A hlds is running at port 22200.
Have these messages to do with the NET_SendPacket Error?
Can I ignore them?
Regards,
Marcel
Oh yeah forgot that bit :-) lol
---
Chris Adams
Fragzzhost
T (07005) 964 855
F (07005) 964 857
www.fragzzhost.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Hartland
Sent: 08 February 2005 23:29
To: hlds_l
We have reproduced the problem internally and are working on a fix.
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred
Reynolds Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 1:35 PM To:
hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Remote
expl
--On Tuesday, February 08, 2005 2:33 PM -0800 "Reza A. Ambler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why is send() returning that value though ? Was the daemon not built
robustly enough to handle unexpected errors?
Since UDP is connectionless and the packet is sent "blind" with no
acknowledgement, this would
Yep all details forwarded to the relevant peps. Wont say any more,
but you do need rcon access so its not as high prio as the one being
discussed here from what I've seen.
Steve / K
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There is also a remote exploit out there whi
Why is send() returning that value though ? Was the daemon not built
robustly enough to handle unexpected errors?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred
Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 12:37 PM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.co
There is also a remote exploit out there which doesn't even involve
connecting to the server (under Linux only). I was involved in some
tests yesterday :-). The people who have actually found the problem and
have the suspect packet(s) are mailing Valve soon I think. The symptoms
were that the serve
Sorry, but this problem was reported a month ago. You got
logfiles too... Topic was "Server Crash Exploit Part 2" by hondaman.
Aha, a way to reproduce the problem! Just what we needed, I will pass
this on to the team :)
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Aha, a way to reproduce the problem! Just what we needed, I will pass
this on to the team :)
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Fool
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 7:49 AM To:
hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds_
> Funny. Am i right if i say that the server tries to disconnect a
> non-existing user?
> I mean he connects, disconnects fast, server catches he's banned, server
> triesd to disconnect, but, the user is already disconnected == application
> error?
>
> Or... it's just not so easy? :)
Could be. My
This value is being returned by the send() library function (when
sending a UDP packet). You can ignore these errors if you don't see any
other side effects on your server (like people being disconnected from
the server unexpectedly).
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ma
Hi,
We are also getting these errors on some of our CS 1.6 Servers.
Does anybody know what this exactly means?
Regards,
Marcel
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux-
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabrice (grosnours) Toppi
| Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 200
rofl!
richy wrote:
William Warren wrote:
1.5? I hope you meant 1.6 and mistyped. NOt that Vac is any
better on 1.6. VAC right now has not been updated in minths.
Sergejs Afanajevs wrote:
Helo i have cs 1.5 server instaled on my server. I try to set up vac
but it not working?My server is localted
William Warren wrote:
1.5? I hope you meant 1.6 and mistyped. NOt that Vac is any
better on 1.6. VAC right now has not been updated in minths.
Sergejs Afanajevs wrote:
Helo i have cs 1.5 server instaled on my server. I try to set up vac
but it not working?My server is localted on linux router,af
1.5? I hope you meant 1.6 and mistyped. NOt that Vac is any
better on 1.6. VAC right now has not been updated in minths.
Sergejs Afanajevs wrote:
Helo i have cs 1.5 server instaled on my server. I try to set up vac but it not
working?My server is localted on linux router,after router is windows
Helo i have cs 1.5 server instaled on my server. I try to set up vac but it not
working?My server is localted on linux router,after router is windows client
and on this pc i can set up windows dedicated server with working vac.On linux
box i have all ports open,start server from user root,and fo
Hi,
Since early this smorning (GMT+1), all our Counter-Strike Steam servers
are getting *a lot* of these errors.
What could cause that ? How to solve it ?
Thanks in advance,
grosnours
--
GameOnline
Game Servers Renting
ADSL Provider
http://www.gameonline.be
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Sounds like a good idea. Are you familiar with tcpdump or Ethereal?
This looks like an easy one to capture, as you've got a fixed IP you
can filter on.
I am, I work in the security industry. :)
My question really is, would Valve look at them? I will be getting
pcaps and passing them on regardless
Funny. Am i right if i say that the server tries to disconnect a
non-existing user?
I mean he connects, disconnects fast, server catches he's banned, server
triesd to disconnect, but, the user is already disconnected == application
error?
Or... it's just not so easy? :)
Starting a new thread, this
It can be stopped with a server side plugin. All you have to do is to
check the banned users steamid and ban the IP when he connects.
Its working within our server plugin. Unfortunatly, I dont have the
code in a seperate plugin, but it is very easy to implement. A decent
coder can do this.
Starting
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Jesper Sørensen wrote:
> Set up some MRTG and graph the interface(s) for your server(s) - And the
> interface(s) that are used for your ISP connection(s).
> That should give you some info about what is going on traffic wise.
There already are monitored through the
25 matches
Mail list logo
