I would have said your map name had a typo too, maybe you shouldnt knock
back people so fast...
Whats the error message you get?
Also, make sure rcon_address is set to "" when you join your server, so it
tries to connect to the server your currently playing on.
- Original Message -
From:
Well wow you spotted a typo. Anyway always a good thing to make other people
laugh.
That typo is not present in the command line I use.
(As you can read, I can connect to the server. Which must mean that I
spelled correctly or that I have a map called de_aztex)
Regards Drone
www.oldboys.dk
-O
Bad news on this! Very bad news...
hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com schrieb am 08.06.05 22:32:32:
>
> The 64-bit binaries do not support the new VAC system at this time. We
> plan to release 64-bit support in the future but I don't have a firm
> timetable. In the meantime you can run the 32-bit
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
> In a bold display of creativity, Ondřej Hošek wrote:
>
>> How about dropping this flame war? I don't want to waste my monthly
>> bandwidth transferring your screaming at each other.
>
>
> Out of curiosity, what kind of connection do you have in which you pay
> for bandwidth
Version 1.0.0.43 works fine for me too.
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux-
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Britt Priddy (PZ)
| Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 6:32 AM
| To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
| Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The update broke HLSW?
|
In a bold display of creativity, Ondřej Hošek wrote:
How about dropping this flame war? I don't want to waste my monthly
bandwidth transferring your screaming at each other.
Out of curiosity, what kind of connection do you have in which you pay
for bandwidth by the byte and where a few plain-te
Strange - its working for me fine. (HL1 / TFC)
- Original Message -
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The update broke HLSW?
Unfortunately 1.0.0.43 isn't working in my case.
I'll just keep waiting for the HLSW devel
How about dropping this flame war? I don't want to waste my monthly
bandwidth transferring your screaming at each other.
*Ahem.*
I think the variable should be flagged as a cheat, *just to be on the
safe side*. I find CS: S frustrating enough without this, and if
somebody kills me just because he
On 6/7/05, Glenn Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless they want to catch the cheaters completely off-guard :)
>
Yeah they did warn about this coming months ago. I really have no
direct interest in VAC2, I was just stating that I knew security fixes
were coming. Anyways having people whine
On 6/8/05, Andreas Kang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone where can solve my problem?
>
> I want to give several admins access to our CS boxes, but I do not want them
> all to have the same login account. That way I wont have any control of who
> did what if you know what I mean. I added 2 user
Anyone where can solve my problem?
I want to give several admins access to our CS boxes, but I do not want them
all to have the same login account. That way I wont have any control of who did
what if you know what I mean. I added 2 users with name kang and entak, and I
have added them in the sa
Unfortunately 1.0.0.43 isn't working in my case.
I'll just keep waiting for the HLSW developers because I'm sure they're
aware of what's going on :o).
Tom
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The update broke
Please, just leave me alone!
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The update broke HLSW?
Tom wrote:
Just keep your insults to yourself and please try and stop "helping".
Some may say,
There is a new beta version 1.0.0.43 out and it works for me flawless,
except that HL1 Server that have not been updated yet get a timeout
after some minutes monitoring.
Greets,
Frank
PiTaGoRaS wrote:
version 1.0.0.42 doesn't fully work with the new queries for HLDS, not even
with sv_e
Tom wrote:
Just keep your insults to yourself and please try and stop "helping".
Some may say, suggesting reading the existing threads on the topic, is
helping.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
vis
Just keep your insults to yourself and please try and stop "helping".
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The update broke HLSW?
Clayton Macleod wrote:
one could point out that it might
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do have sv_enableoldqueries 1 set, however I don't seem to be able to query
the servers still :/
Updating to a newer qstat isn't a problem, just waiting for the code to be
updated completely.
Is there a fix for enabling old queries?
-Scott
I confirm this. sv_enab
Lol...maybe try spelling the map correctly?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[Old*Boys]Drone
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 5:18 PM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: SV: [hlds_linux] srcds help rcon not working
Thx for the repl
Clayton Macleod wrote:
one could point out that it might be considered good manners to take a
quick look around to see if what you are about to ask hasn't already
been answered...but that might not be good manners ;)
No, its very bad manners to suggest the use of common sense!
_
Thx for the reply!
Unfortunately that didn't help.
Here is my commandline:
srcds_run -game cstrike +ip xxx.yyy.zzz.qqq +port 27035 +exec server.cfg
+map de_aztex + maxplayers 16 -autoupdate -noipx -tos
Any other suggestions?
(I tried all combinations of +-ip and +-port no difference)
Regards
The 64-bit binaries do not support the new VAC system at this time. We
plan to release 64-bit support in the future but I don't have a firm
timetable. In the meantime you can run the 32-bit binaries, or keep
running the 64-bit binaries on the current VAC system.
- Alfred
Original Message
The update tool gets its own latest version, everything is fine with
the linux base, oh and I have a quick question for Alfred or whoever
may know this, when someone "rcon quit" 's the server in HLDS, it
seems to use a different method than SRCDS, because the script does in
fact function on HLDS in
I didn't notice this at first, but after a few clients came on and
complained their server wasn't updated when I assured then it was I
went ahead and checked this out some more. It seems that the amd64
files where not updated in the latest release. Particularly the
engine_amd64.so which was updated
Yup, we will add this to the next update.
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mario
Benito Ríos Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:28 AM To:
hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Server not
listed in Steam master ser
Hi Alfred or anyone who knows :)
I have a firewall and want to block all ports that I can, since we are being
dosed all the time from hackers.
So witch port does CS need in order to work probably?
I believe just opening for the actual port is not going to work?
Regards Andreas
--
No virus fou
Might want to just check u do have a compatible linux_base
installed, we use linux_base-8 ( redhat 8 based ).
Not sure if u can download a more up to date version of the
update tool. If not shout Im sure someone can host it for u.
Steve / K
- Original Message -
From: "m0gely" <[EMAIL P
Steven Hartland wrote:
Cant say I've had any problems with this. Last time I head of a update
coreing was an old install of the update tool.
Kind of a bummer when you need a working updatetool to get the new
version though eh? Is it still the case that the original version is
whats on the Ste
Maybe this thread can help you:
http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=239824
On 08.06.2005 at 12:06 Simon Garner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 8/06/2005 11:13 a.m., Alfred Reynolds wrote:
>>
>> 2) Under Linux you now need at least GLIBC 2.3.2 (i.e what the Source
>> en
one could point out that it might be considered good manners to take a
quick look around to see if what you are about to ask hasn't already
been answered...but that might not be good manners ;)
On 6/8/05, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you actually have any manners?
--
Clayton Macleod
Do you actually have any manners?
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The update broke HLSW?
Tom wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart
Cant say I've had any problems with this. Last time I head of a update
coreing was an old install of the update tool.
Steve / K
- Original Message -
From: "e-Plutonia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alfred, I tried suse, debian, rh8 , rh9, all of them in a row, I am
severely pissed right now a
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Could we ask an option like -steamport for HL1?
Thank you,
Mario Benito
Alfred Reynolds wrote:
>Don't block anything outbound (UDP or TCP). For incoming you need 27009
>-> 27014 UDP and your server
it added the new query code for source yes, but it hasn't been put in for
1.6 yet. You'll probably find there's an alpha released sometime this
evening for it.
- Original Message -
From: "Damien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] T
version 1.0.0.42 doesn't fully work with the new queries for HLDS, not even
with sv_enableoldqueries 1
Alfred should have warned hlsw devs first...
--
PiTaGoRaS
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:23:46 +0200, Damien wrote:
> Since some weeks, HLSW is out with beta 42, fixing that timeout bug.
>
> - Or
launch your server with +ip serverip in the command line, with serverip
being your servers public IP address
- Original Message -
From: "[Old*Boys]Drone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 4:51 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] srcds help rcon not working
>
> Hi list :-)
>
>
35 matches
Mail list logo
