When VAC2 is enabled on my server it still shows the downloading security
module notice...
-Devin
-__--__--
Message: 1
From: "Britt Priddy \(PZ\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Problem connecting to VAC2 secured server with
CS1.6
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:51:29 -0500
Organiza
Well I only recently have seen this problem, I have never had a problem
before connecting to my server when it was using VAC2, just since the last 1
or 2 updates.. also if I disable VAC2 on the server, then the problem goes
away...
-Devin
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, managed to get fedora 4 installed on FBSD 5.3... Lets see tomorrow if
we get any crashes..
/Bjorn
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, kama wrote:
>
> Didnt get the time to upgrade the servers yesterday... But I managed to
> write a Fedora 4 port. Ill test it today or tomorrow... now off to install
> new s
> ick..that's tons of crud. I suggest a reload using hte minimal
> option(ssh will get installedthen yum install whatever you
> need(which for CS isn't anything for a basic server.
>
> When that's done then issue a yum remove sendmail
>
> Then i usualy install webmin as it's low in resource us
ick..that's tons of crud. I suggest a reload using hte minimal
option(ssh will get installedthen yum install whatever you
need(which for CS isn't anything for a basic server.
When that's done then issue a yum remove sendmail
Then i usualy install webmin as it's low in resource usage and mak
I couldnt tell you for sure. this is the packages section from the
kickstart file that was generated
%packages
@ web-server
@ server-cfg
@ dialup
@ development-tools
@ text-internet
kernel-smp-devel
kernel-smp
e2fsprogs
sendmail is on the system as I am sure other things are as well.
I will
It has to be something configuration wise since others with less beefy
machines are running the same loads.
HOw did you install CentOS? di you use the minimal install and then add
stuff in? I always install via minimal install and then yum install
. This minimizes the crap that gets installed
> I'll try to get you some "stats" information when I get home from work. I
> leave the ticrate alone so most I'll see is 100fps.
That would be great.
> > 2. My servers stop respoding to queries. hlsw just shows the machine as
> > timed out. Same with the steam browser. Is anyone else
> > expe
I am running amxmodx.
77MB
32.4% cpu utilization on a full 20 man cs server.
The system has 2GB of ram. My problem isnt how much memory its using.
It is the cpu utilization. I don't believe I had this problem when
the server was running the Windows OS. I will try different distros
as soon as
> 1. I see much greater cpu utilization for the hlds binary in linux than
> I do Windows server 2003. Is this to be expected? Should I be running
> my servers with different options? Not using the i686 binary?
I use the i686 binary. I can put 3 to 4 completely full CS 1.6 servers on
a dual Xeon
And i suggested trying CentOS 3.5..:)
What are you server.cfg's(blank out your rcon passwords) Also what are
your memory statstics? Are you running any mods as well?
Scott Tuttle wrote:
Try it under linux..I run a cs 1.6 server i have an srcds server at idle
and i run two teamspeak servers on
> Try it under linux..I run a cs 1.6 server i have an srcds server at idle
> and i run two teamspeak servers on my 2.54 ghz celey w/o issues.
I see now where you said you missed the first part of the issue
I had no problems running under Windows 2003. If I wasnt having
issues under linux I w
> Try it under linux..I run a cs 1.6 server i have an srcds server at idle
> and i run two teamspeak servers on my 2.54 ghz celey w/o issues.
Have you read any of this thread?
I am on linux and that seems to be my apparent problem.
___
To unsubscribe,
Try it under linux..I run a cs 1.6 server i have an srcds server at idle
and i run two teamspeak servers on my 2.54 ghz celey w/o issues.
Scott Tuttle wrote:
Well at one point I tried to run 3 1.6 servers on a p4 2.8 I think it
was. It would croak. I would never try to do that and leave it lik
Well at one point I tried to run 3 1.6 servers on a p4 2.8 I think it
was. It would croak. I would never try to do that and leave it like
that. I just wanted to see what the limit was. I was also running
linux at the time.
I suspect I could have put more servers on my opteron and had more
play
I asked about this off list - and its normal - VAC2 doesn't display
"Downloading Security Module" anymore.
- Original Message -
From: "LuZiFeR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 12:44 PM
Subject: AW: [hlds_linux] Problem connecting to VAC2 secured server with
CS1.6
I can't really comment on the rest, I have no experience with Windows
servers. If its any aid to you, I run Debian 3.1 with (currently) the
2.6.12.3 kernel. I've always had a 2.6 kernel, even on Debian 3.0
Reading the below though, I don't believe your setup was truly that
different from mine. At
Hi,
After the update to VAC2, my Clients don't have to download a
Security-Modul...
Are you sure, that the Server running on the right version ?
Regards Luzi
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Jordan
Barker
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Au
hae you tired CentOS 3.5 which is 2.4.xxx based with x86-64 support?
Scott Tuttle wrote:
I guess I missed this before.. But you're wanting to put 3+ active servers
on (Presumable a dual Opteron or even dual Opteron dual-cores) on your
server?
That is correct.
I use Dual Xeon's with Hypert
> I guess I missed this before.. But you're wanting to put 3+ active servers
> on (Presumable a dual Opteron or even dual Opteron dual-cores) on your
> server?
That is correct.
> I use Dual Xeon's with Hyperthreading enabled. Granted I believe the
> Opteron (Dual core or not) in general has an ed
I guess I missed this before.. But you're wanting to put 3+ active servers
on (Presumable a dual Opteron or even dual Opteron dual-cores) on your
server?
I use Dual Xeon's with Hyperthreading enabled. Granted I believe the
Opteron (Dual core or not) in general has an edge on Xeon's, but I can't
se
On another note. Can some of you guys running linux give me the
output from your stats command on a server that is running say 16 to
20 people if you have any at this point that have many players on. I
would like to see how much cpu it says you are using. Please include
which distro you are usin
> One problem these days is that the statistics gathering/reporting tools
> do not handle Intel's HT feature well. There was a thread a month or so
> back where people were turning it off to get better statistics. I
> wouldn't turn it off myself, it improves performance, but it does make
> understa
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Yeah, that is the problem. Since an HT system reports twice as many
processors, vmstat mis-reports maximum CPU usage. It sees four
processors reported, but in reality there are only two execution units.
Ok, the relevant mentioning for HLDS:
http://steampowered.com/index.php?area=news&id=431 @ see "sv_uploadmax".
IIRC it's set at 0.5mb by default.
SRCDS has no such limit AFAIK. I'm unsure of dimension restrictions,
never had an issue there.
Kyle Milnes wrote:
I think that is all well and good f
Hi all,
After valve did the hl1 query protocol changes, our bot scrip never got
updated cause the author issnt around anymore.
In the script the this part is the one responsible for the query, could some
one make the changes in it from the old to the new query? Ive been trying it
myself, unsuccesf
26 matches
Mail list logo
