In a bold display of creativity, Scott Pettit wrote:
cmd/update at 101 = 101 updates/s - hence why I can't see a point in having
1000fps and so on - all those extra frams would just be dumped.
What's the point in being able to push so many clock cycles? All those
extra cycles would just be dum
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
cmd/update at 101 = 101 updates/s - hence why I can't see a point in having
1000fps and so on - all those extra frams would just be dumped.
On 12/12/05, Andrew Forsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 13:46 +1300, Scott Petti
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 13:46 +1300, Scott Pettit wrote:
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> What's the point in an FPS over about 150fps anyhow?
The more frequent the snapshots the more accurate each client's update
is. The client's don't get snapshots simultaneously, they req
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
What's the point in an FPS over about 150fps anyhow?
On 12/12/05, Kennycom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Was FC4 not standard with a 1000hz kernel?
> What FPS are you getting and what is your fps_max setting at?
>
> FPS tops out at around 333 on
Was FC4 not standard with a 1000hz kernel?
What FPS are you getting and what is your fps_max setting at?
FPS tops out at around 333 on Linux, but you have to have a setting of 500
or above to reach it.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 5:2
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I've also noticed heavily increased CPU usage.
We have a 32 player WC3 server (which is notorious for using heaps of cpu)
1.6 server running on an AMD64 3200+ using 30-40% cpu max. (hlds)
However we have a 24 player Source server (stock standard
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
We had someone on our DOD:S server like that. Had a name that said "you
can't ban me for TKs" or something like that, and he had no steam ID. We
banned his IP and he hasn't been back so far.
On 12/11/05, Jon Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I believe that means the person is using a non official steam client. Not
sure though.
JonD
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 12:29 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] Myg0t problems
I've reported this to Alfred but I think mor
It's a dedcated server in Equinix in Chicago, I've tried a fresh
install, 2.6.11 and 2.6.14 kernels, and no plugins running at all. And
its srcds, I just want 1 private match server out of it so I have no
need to install any mods/plugins other than CSP.
__
Not only have I noticed much higher CPU usage on the SRCDS engine, but I
have noticed that it used the same % and mem % no matter what hardware
platform is used. On Dual 244 Opterons w/ 2GB Ram, even a 12 person 100
tickrate server utilizes between 40% and 65% CPU and 4-6% MEM (CPU out
of 200%).
I noticed higher cpu usage too at srcds on freebsd. Usually the system is
running at 1-1.5 load
and now nothing has changed (, just updates) and load is around 3.
Ecsy
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, pleas
Hey Everyone,
I've got a few servers running Fedora Core4 which are currently locked at a
certain FPS, after some research and a lot of opinions of a few other GSP's
I have been told to recompile the kernel under 1000hz but I have no idea
where to start..
Could someone give me a resource / guide
I've reported this to Alfred but I think more people should be aware of it.
For the last couple of days one of my servers has been getting "raged"
by a myg0t. Somehow he's able to stay connected to the server with
steam_id_pending so the only way to ban him is via ip and as is typical
with these
One tickrate 66 css server now uses up to 80 percent (average about
50-60) of a 2.4 ghz p4 with ht enabled when having 12 players on it. But
the server is a 16 players and the machine has to host other servers as
well... In this case it's a 2.6.9-gentoo-r9 linux.
I looked at it again: same serve
Is this srcds or hlds you are talking about?
/Bjorn
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, Charles wrote:
> 2.4ghz celeron with 1gig of ram
>
>
> Takes 10-15% cpu usage per player... FC4 with 2.6.11 kernel, also tried
> 2.6.9 and 2.6.14 All are 5% idle and 10-15% per player
> after that, I can't
I noticed higher cpu usage as well but until now didn't have the time to
investigate any further.
One tickrate 66 css server now uses up to 80 percent (average about
50-60) of a 2.4 ghz p4 with ht enabled when having 12 players on it. But
the server is a 16 players and the machine has to host oth
2.4ghz celeron with 1gig of ram
Takes 10-15% cpu usage per player... FC4 with 2.6.11 kernel, also tried
2.6.9 and 2.6.14 All are 5% idle and 10-15% per player
after that, I can't even run a 10 player server without getting
rediculously low tickrate out (like 5-10). Also tried -b
17 matches
Mail list logo
