That is funny because in the Valve press release over 3 years ago announcing
64bit support they were showing over 30% cpu savings in their tests. - and
most of us see more than that now.
"In a straight port of code highly optimized for x86-32, Counter-Strike
dedicated server tests with both 32
Gee, they sure did make a big deal about releasing 64bit binaries two
years ago I think the hosting companies, which deal with this game
and it's subsequent faults on a daily basis, might know what they are
talking about. The 64bit binaries are more stable for high frames,
provide lower CPU
Just ignore me. I was answering 4 different questions at the same time.
(though honestly Valve has no reason to support 64bit binaries at this
time.)
Stuart Stegall wrote:
64bit binaries don't really provide any benefit unless you are dealing
with some 64 bit floats or integers. (It would help
Someone posted the error message. Sometimes they still showup in the
server logs. I believe what happens is sometimes the servers don't show
up as Secure in the ingame search and people who are banned attempt to
connect to your server and then the server which actually is in secure
mode catches
64bit binaries don't really provide any benefit unless you are dealing
with some 64 bit floats or integers. (It would help not using the lib32
libraries, but this really isn't a Valve problem)
Hans Vos wrote:
VALVE,
Do you have any information regarding the implementation of VAC2 for the
AMD64
Only a little niggle and not important at all but.
Any chance the hlds_run script can be changed for the next update to set
the auto-detect to pick up AMD Opteron / AMD64 as the amd binaries
rather than still try and run them as 64bit but without vac2. At least
until Vac2 is released on 2004
VALVE,
Do you have any information regarding the implementation of VAC2 for the
AMD64 binaries for Half-Life Dedicated Server? It is my understanding
that the number of 64-bit servers used, both AMD Opteron and Athlon 64
based, is increasing exponentially. We only use AMD Opteron based
servers fo
Two errors while shutting down a CS:S server:
L 03/10/2006 - 22:41:28: server_message: "quit"
threadtools.cpp (237) : Assertion Failed: Thread synchronization object is
unuseable
L 03/10/2006 - 22:41:28: Log file closed
L 03/10/2006 - 22:41:28: server_message: "restart"
Memory leak: mempool block
Mine are:
*IP/Port*: 195.224.41.11:27015
*Hostname*: Wireplay Counter-Strike: Source #1 [FF On, Popular Rotation]
*Max Players:* 12
*Tick Rate*: 100
*Rotation*: Popular [cs_militia, de_aztec, de_dust, cs_italy, de_dust2,
cs_office, de_nuke]
*IP/Port*: 195.224.41.11:27016
*Hostname*: Wireplay Cou
I'm running the latest version, so VAC2. But still i have the feeling i've
seen some banmessage/quitmessage with VAC(2) related comments in it. Hmm,
maybe i'm seeying ghosts ;)
-W0kk3L-
- Original Message -
From: "Stuart Stegall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 8:07
Obviously unless you are running an old version of HLDS you will be
using VAC2.
Ronny Schedel wrote:
For VAC1 look for the string "Secure:". VAC2 doesn't log bans, because
the
cheater will be banned after they leave the server.
Regards
Ronny
Question, is it possible to find out who was banne
I have this one example by way of the listserv, unsure if it helps you
or not.
[start]
This is all I have so far regarding VAC:
L 06/22/2005 - 14:54:09: "ANNIHILATION<9><>" connected,
address "24.1.xxx.xxx:27005"
L 06/22/2005 - 14:54:10: "ANNIHILATION" STEAM USERID
validated
L 06/22/2005 - 14:54
For VAC1 look for the string "Secure:". VAC2 doesn't log bans, because the
cheater will be banned after they leave the server.
Regards
Ronny
Question, is it possible to find out who was banned by VAC in the
logfiles?
I know clients recieve a kickmessage when they get booted, but i can't
seem
t
Question, is it possible to find out who was banned by VAC in the logfiles?
I know clients recieve a kickmessage when they get booted, but i can't seem
to find anything about it in the serverlog. Is there a way to register this?
I'd like to register who gets banned by VAC, by SteamBans and by our
We are running a server with all standard maps and many custom maps. It can
happen on every map. I am very sure about that.
Regards
Ronny
Are you sure about that? Cause i run 6 CS:S servers, and only one, the
cs_office only, is crashing. The others run without problems, as far as i
have detect
moo moo moo moo (My Bad)
-D
- Original Message -
From: "Deacon - Digital Gaming eXtreme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; "Alfred Reynolds"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: [hlds_announce] Source and Half-Life 1
Dedicated server update releas
Pfew! ;)
- Original Message -
From: "Saint K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: [hlds_announce] Source and Half-Life 1
Dedicated server update released
Sorry for sending this to the linux list (its friday :P)
- Original Mes
Sorry for sending this to the linux list (its friday :P)
- Original Message -
From: "Saint K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; "Alfred Reynolds"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: [hlds_announce] Source and Half-Life 1
Dedicated server update r
Are u m8s talking abouth Windows servers now ?
I have 2 nix´s and they working correctly
//Ari
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Deacon - Digital Gaming
eXtreme
Skickat: den 10 mars 2006 15:36
Till: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com; Alfred
Same here. I didn't see any during the beta, but yesterday I had two
servers w/ users stuck w/o steam ids.
- Original Message -
From: "Saint K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; "Alfred Reynolds"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: [hlds_announ
Alfred,
The update still didnt fully fix the STEAM VALIDATION REJECTED bug. We're
still having this bug on our windows machines.
Ive checked and double checked if the update installed correctly, and ran a
verify all update.
The server console displays the same message as before.
Saint K.
- O
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>
> Is this a server side only change and thus will people still be able to
> play on the older version?
> Is a fix for the renice problem due out today?
The two servers of ours that got rebooted and broke due to the renice
problem have now been
--
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:37:47 +
Richard Fennell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bubbled:
> We have nearly 350 servers and they are all reniced.
> Why do we do it? Performance, testing has shown that the server
> performs better.
That also depends on the kernel version and its scheduler changes ...
On n
We have nearly 350 servers and they are all reniced.
Why do we do it? Performance, testing has shown that the server performs
better. In the same way that many people increase the priority of the
srcds in Windows.
Is this a server side only change and thus will people still be able to
play on th
24 matches
Mail list logo
