This is all really awesome information everyone and I am very appreciative
of all your ime and knowledge... however...
What does this mean to the guy who hasn't recompiled a linux kenel before?
Right now I'm seting fps_max on the command line to 500. Can I get more than
500 fps without recompiling
At 05:04 PM 9/5/2009, Gregg Hanpeter wrote:
>So what is the secret to achieving 2000 fps if I dump the real time patch?
>I've never tried this but am now thinking about it.
Lie to the engine about when sleeping wakeups occur.
-M
___
To unsubscribe,
At 09:50 AM 9/5/2009, Joseph Laws wrote:
>I've never cared for the RT patches...but the hi-res timers pre 2.6.24
>are very solid.
RT patches try and reduce the latency of a great multitude of things,
but the only ones that really count
are the scheduler latency. The 2.6.22 kernels without CFS ar
At 09:50 AM 9/5/2009, Joseph Laws wrote:
>I've never cared for the RT patches...but the hi-res timers pre 2.6.24
>are very solid.
RT patches try and reduce the latency of a great multitude of things,
but the only ones that really count
are the scheduler latency. The 2.6.22 kernels without CFS ar
At 05:04 PM 9/5/2009, Gregg Hanpeter wrote:
>So what is the secret to achieving 2000 fps if I dump the real time patch?
>I've never tried this but am now thinking about it.
Lie to the engine about when sleeping wakeups occur.
-M
___
To unsubscribe,
So what is the secret to achieving 2000 fps if I dump the real time patch?
I've never tried this but am now thinking about it.
--
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Joseph Laws wrote:
> I've never cared for the RT patches...but the hi-res timers pre 2.6.24
>
So autoupdate works again?
Eric Greer skrev:
> just add -autoupdate to the command line at reboot the server
> Eric
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Nightbox wrote:
>
>
>> Is it possible ?
>> ___
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or
I've never cared for the RT patches...but the hi-res timers pre 2.6.24
are very solid.
John wrote:
>>> You need high res timers (HPET), on a newer kernel (2.6.24)
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>> I hated that kernel version. I'm running 2.6.26.5-rt8. And even with hpet
>> enabled you still want the highe
At 02:20 AM 9/5/2009, John wrote:
> >> You need high res timers (HPET), on a newer kernel (2.6.24)
> >>
> >> -M
> >
> >I hated that kernel version. I'm running 2.6.26.5-rt8. And even with hpet
> > enabled you still want the higher kernel frequency wouldn't you?
>
>I think Gary meant that you'd need
At 02:20 AM 9/5/2009, John wrote:
> >> You need high res timers (HPET), on a newer kernel (2.6.24)
> >>
> >> -M
> >
> >I hated that kernel version. I'm running 2.6.26.5-rt8. And even with hpet
> > enabled you still want the higher kernel frequency wouldn't you?
>
>I think Gary meant that you'd need
10 matches
Mail list logo