's which ran at
>5.0 to 7.0 load with only 50% CPU usage.
>
>On 8/18/05, Sid Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>>--
>>[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>>One problem these days is tha
__
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>
>
--
/Sid Stuart
Games Engineering /
Yahoo! Games
The benchmarks I have run with 64-bit applications running under a
64-bit OS (needed to get the extra eight registers) have all seen a
10-15% improvement in performance. Here is a url to some published
results as well,
http://enterprise.amd.com/downloadables/Bioinformatics_performance.pdf
Scratch
e Technician)
>
> Linux user #322099
> Machines:
> 206822
> 256638
> 276825
> http://counter.li.org/
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
ironment, but its very nature means you can't really tell how much
>it will help out. Nor can you easily measure exactly how much idle
>time you have left, because of the slight of hand that's involved. But
>if you turn HT off you can very accurately tell how much CPU is
>actua
Actually, the top utility will track utilization across all CPU's quite
nicely. No reason to turn HT off to understand what the system is doing.
Start the top program and then type 1 (the number one). This should give
a load average by CPU display in the summary area.
Matt Donnon wrote:
I'm sur
Please help me with any information you can thanks so much.
>
>
>
> _______
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware
[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]/0
> 5805 ?SN 0:00 0 93 1706 804 0.0 vsftpd
> 5807 ?SN 0:01 093 1814 908 0.0 vsftpd
> 5917 pts/0R 0:00 064 2215 568 0.0 ps vax
>
> I'll turn AMX off in the metamod config and see what affect
More information is needed to diagnose the performance problem,
Run a "vmstat 1" for about 10 seconds while the three programs are
running and post the results.
Also do a "ps vax" and post the results from that. With the output from
those two programs, I can see whether it is CPU or memory bound
I think the price performance ratio of the Athlon X2 64 might be better
than going with Opterons.
Matt Donnon wrote:
I think it is pretty obvious from past threads that at least most of
this
mailing list agrees that Opterons are the processor of choice for
hosting
any CS servers. But now with t
ux distro is Gentoo.
>
>If anyone has good/bad experiences, please let me know.
>
>
>
>
>___
>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
>visit:
>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/list
11 matches
Mail list logo
