RE: [hlds_linux] Longer ping times with 3.1.1.0d?

2003-08-14 Thread sol.greyfox
Stefan wrote: > LOL, this isn't even related to either of the two things discussed in > this thread. > What's up nowdays anyway? Don't all mailclients come with a NEW MESSAGE > option any more, just a "reply to random message" button? Ya, um, What's up nowadays anyway? Don't people actually read

RE: [hlds_linux] Is WON Down?

2003-08-14 Thread sol.greyfox
Stefan wrote: > Are you saying my mailclinet has suddenly become broken? Yup, I am saying your mailclinet has suddenly become broken. The title of his message was "[hlds_linux] Is WON Down?". ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the

Re: [hlds_linux] Log bufferoverFlow attacks

2003-08-14 Thread sol.greyfox
JGava wrote: I have a problem, I need to discover who this attacking my cs servers, does anybody know a solution for linux or windows that it registers/logs the attacks for wonid or ip? Packet sniffer? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or v

RE: [hlds_linux] Is WON Down?

2003-08-14 Thread sol.greyfox
Marcelo Bezerra wrote: > This is how sane mailclients organize messages in threads, not by > guessing based on subject. Sorry, guess I forgot to feed my client his meds this week. :rolls eyes: Stefan Huszics wrote: ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list

RE: [hlds_linux] Longer ping times with 3.1.1.0d?

2003-08-14 Thread sol.greyfox
Stefan wrote: > FYI threading NEVER is supposed to be handled by the subject/topic of a > mail. That is only done in REALLY CRAPPY mailclients. If you use one of > those please download any one of the massive number of good nonbroken > mailclients both for your own as well as everyboy elses comfort