I don't have any fun playing cs unless I'm singing over the mic.. how can
you do that to people like me??!!
- Original Message -
From: "kama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux]
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
> kama wrote:
> > Deacon, I have disabled the internal voicecom on my servers... not becouse
> > of cpu usage, but becouse i hate when idiots starts to sing or yelling.
>
> What a waste :\ If someone's being dumb, mute them. Or hell, turn off
> your clien
I saw a message that valve was switching to the Speex codec.
Maybe this will improve voice support in understandability
and CPU usage. Those guys over a Xiph.org are awesome.
>
> I think voice chat is was a great idea. The problem is that
> alot of players
> microphones seem to work great with
ate on the
subject.
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jan Brunner
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:32 PM
To: Mikkel "Miklos" Georgsen
Subject: Ingame Voice/Ghosting (was: Re[2]: [hlds_linux] 3.1.1.0c -
3.1.1.1d Performance...)
Hello M
Hello Mikkel,
MMG> I don't know a single clan who uses the voicecom in CS - they all use
MMG> TeamSpeak2 or Ventrilo2 - which takes up 0-1% CPU because, as we know
MMG> voicechat is simply just a proxy function - encoding/decoding is done
MMG> clientside.
A lot of American Clans use the ingame Voi
> You cant get any smoother and better gameplay than pb3 on .0c. As many
> have stated: clans will not play on servers that have .1x on the server.
It's very true. Many people will not play on 3.1.1.1 servers because of
the hitbox issues. One community that rents a server from me was losing
all of
>And last of all I want to quote on thing that nailed it from Michael
>Ressens post:
> "Anything that can be done to aid in the load issue we're
> facing is going to be the most welcome relief to us."
Yes PLEASE!
Problem is - people want valve to fix cheating - but they also want them to
fix pe
After reading over 2000 mails in this list today this is what I have to
say about this issue...
CPU usage is the really big reason. At the very least the CPU usage should
be as .0c, preferable lower than that.
Michael Ressen has a good point when he declare that we as admins can not
afford to up
8 matches
Mail list logo
