On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 11:51:52 -0400, Justin Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you try launching it without specifying the ip and port? Ya never know
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 07:42:17 -0700 (PDT), Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I
rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.3.2-4.80.8
Mine starts up and people play on it and its a RH box.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Justin
Mitchell
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 11:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] RH9 and RH7 with
hi,
how is your CPU usage? better then 1.6?
thx
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] RH9 and RH7 with glibc 2.3 - won't start for me
rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.3.2-4.80.8
Mine starts up and
Justin Mitchell wrote:
FYI I'm running RHEL 3.0 with no problems. And yeah, that's the proper
way to check the glibc version (assuming you didn't overwrite it with
another non-rpm installation).
Hence, I'd suggest that the proper way to check the glibc version is to
ask the glibc itself:
$
Seems to be about the same - more stable tho. Not all over the place like
1.6 - maybe its just me tho. 1.6 will fluctuate too much. I watched top with
the updates at 1 a sec and with 14-16 players in it sat there at 16-20% or
so.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
5 matches
Mail list logo