Re: [hlds_linux] RH9 and RH7 with glibc 2.3 - won't start for me

2004-08-14 Thread Justin Mitchell
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 11:51:52 -0400, Justin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you try launching it without specifying the ip and port? Ya never know On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 07:42:17 -0700 (PDT), Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I

RE: [hlds_linux] RH9 and RH7 with glibc 2.3 - won't start for me

2004-08-14 Thread admin
rpm -q glibc glibc-2.3.2-4.80.8 Mine starts up and people play on it and its a RH box. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Justin Mitchell Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 11:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] RH9 and RH7 with

Re: [hlds_linux] RH9 and RH7 with glibc 2.3 - won't start for me

2004-08-14 Thread ranger
hi, how is your CPU usage? better then 1.6? thx - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 7:34 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] RH9 and RH7 with glibc 2.3 - won't start for me rpm -q glibc glibc-2.3.2-4.80.8 Mine starts up and

Re: [hlds_linux] RH9 and RH7 with glibc 2.3 - won't start for me

2004-08-14 Thread Florian Zschocke
Justin Mitchell wrote: FYI I'm running RHEL 3.0 with no problems. And yeah, that's the proper way to check the glibc version (assuming you didn't overwrite it with another non-rpm installation). Hence, I'd suggest that the proper way to check the glibc version is to ask the glibc itself: $

RE: [hlds_linux] RH9 and RH7 with glibc 2.3 - won't start for me

2004-08-14 Thread admin
Seems to be about the same - more stable tho. Not all over the place like 1.6 - maybe its just me tho. 1.6 will fluctuate too much. I watched top with the updates at 1 a sec and with 14-16 players in it sat there at 16-20% or so. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL