ext4 here as well, seems pretty solid.
Cheers,
Kyle.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Alon Gubkin wrote:
> I use ext4, works perfectly.
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Nephyrin Zey >wrote:
>
> > My servers have been using ext4 for a year or so without incident
> >
> > - Neph
> >
> > On S
I use ext4, works perfectly.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Nephyrin Zey wrote:
> My servers have been using ext4 for a year or so without incident
>
> - Neph
>
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, ics wrote:
> > They are fine.
> >
> > -ics
> >
> > 28.8.2010 21:03, Marc Aldorasi kirjoitti:
>
My servers have been using ext4 for a year or so without incident
- Neph
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, ics wrote:
> They are fine.
>
> -ics
>
> 28.8.2010 21:03, Marc Aldorasi kirjoitti:
>>
>> I'm setting up a server, and am planning on running srcds on it. / is
>> probably going to be form
They are fine.
-ics
28.8.2010 21:03, Marc Aldorasi kirjoitti:
I'm setting up a server, and am planning on running srcds on it. / is
probably going to be formatted with reiserfs or ext4. Are these good
file systems for srcds, or should I put it on a separate partition
with a different fs?
__
I'm setting up a server, and am planning on running srcds on it. / is
probably going to be formatted with reiserfs or ext4. Are these good
file systems for srcds, or should I put it on a separate partition
with a different fs?
___
To unsubscribe, edit
5 matches
Mail list logo