Re: [hlds_linux] Server file system choice

2010-08-31 Thread Kyle Sanderson
ext4 here as well, seems pretty solid. Cheers, Kyle. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Alon Gubkin wrote: > I use ext4, works perfectly. > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Nephyrin Zey >wrote: > > > My servers have been using ext4 for a year or so without incident > > > > - Neph > > > > On S

Re: [hlds_linux] Server file system choice

2010-08-31 Thread Alon Gubkin
I use ext4, works perfectly. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Nephyrin Zey wrote: > My servers have been using ext4 for a year or so without incident > > - Neph > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, ics wrote: > > They are fine. > > > > -ics > > > > 28.8.2010 21:03, Marc Aldorasi kirjoitti: >

Re: [hlds_linux] Server file system choice

2010-08-31 Thread Nephyrin Zey
My servers have been using ext4 for a year or so without incident - Neph On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, ics wrote: >  They are fine. > > -ics > > 28.8.2010 21:03, Marc Aldorasi kirjoitti: >> >> I'm setting up a server, and am planning on running srcds on it.  / is >> probably going to be form

Re: [hlds_linux] Server file system choice

2010-08-28 Thread ics
They are fine. -ics 28.8.2010 21:03, Marc Aldorasi kirjoitti: I'm setting up a server, and am planning on running srcds on it. / is probably going to be formatted with reiserfs or ext4. Are these good file systems for srcds, or should I put it on a separate partition with a different fs? __

[hlds_linux] Server file system choice

2010-08-28 Thread Marc Aldorasi
I'm setting up a server, and am planning on running srcds on it. / is probably going to be formatted with reiserfs or ext4. Are these good file systems for srcds, or should I put it on a separate partition with a different fs? ___ To unsubscribe, edit