On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
> > It means editing a file either way here :-)
>
> To add a commandline argument??
Yeah, I still use my own startup scripts (from the days when valve didn't
have auto-restart). It's easier to keep track of things when running
multiple servers I've foun
> > > And we all know that linux admins have no business whatsoever
> > combining vi
> > > and system files.
> >
> > Heh, I know plenty that can barely tie their proverbial linux shoes.
> > I'd never recommend that people dig around in even *simple* files
when a
> > simple command-line argument wo
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
> > And we all know that linux admins have no business whatsoever
> combining vi
> > and system files.
>
> Heh, I know plenty that can barely tie their proverbial linux shoes.
> I'd never recommend that people dig around in even *simple* files when a
> s
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Andrew A. Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Oscar N wrote:
>
> > Hmm, now I've searched the net for like 5min and still not finding how
> > to disable secure mode...
>
> Add -insecure to your commandline parameters.
or set secure "0" in liblist.gam
john
_
Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC-PlugIns-Memory
> Have you killed CSGuard/HLGuard? If you're still running CSGuard, I
> can't imagine how out of date it must be. If you're running HLGuard,
> try killing it for a day and see what kind of
> if I understand that right, then there are some probs (heavy cpu load
or mem
> usage) when using VAC on a CS server.
Actually, no.
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
ht
> Have you killed CSGuard/HLGuard? If you're still running CSGuard, I
> can't imagine how out of date it must be. If you're running HLGuard,
> try killing it for a day and see what kind of issues you're having then.
> If you've already killed it off, then yer screwed :P
>
> --
> Eric (the Deacon
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Network
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [hlds_linux] VAC-PlugIns-Memory
>
> Hi all,
>
&
Hi all,
since VAC is the current Anti-Cheat we got serveral problems with
memory-usage.
Before VAC was introduced, we started the servers with CSGuard and/or
Cheating-Death and got no problems with mem and cpu usage. All running fine.
Since we use VAC we see that the hlserver use an unbelievable
9 matches
Mail list logo
