- Original Message -
From: "Stan Hoeppner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:07 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Xeon vs P3
>
> > Xeons could be better. They're not just an SMP capable P4.
>
> Ah
I have been running a 32 player cs server on one of these.
http://www.euro.dell.com/countries/no/nor/pad/products/model_pedge_3_pedge_2650.htm
I used .net standard server on it. Cpu usage was very low indeed.
Take a look
http://storbonden.uio.no/cgi-bin/iB3/ikonboard.cgi?s=3dec65654339;act=S
> Xeons could be better. They're not just an SMP capable P4.
Ahh, but that's exactly what the new Xeon is-- an SMP capable P4. The only
differences are SMP and the optional L3 cache sizes (and hyperthreading,
although the latest--3Ghz--P4 has it also). Also keep in mind that the
XeonDP doesn't
com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q247904
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] En nombre de Simon
Garner
Enviado el: martes, 03 de diciembre de 2002 0:14
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Xeon vs P3
Sounds like this may be more due to the operating sys
ToP CaT =^..^= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dual Xeon MP 2,8 vs Dual P3 1,4 Tualatin (that means 0,13 microns and
> 512 L2 cache) its only 22% improvement on Citrix Metaframe (Terminal
> Services). Thats QUITE dissapointing.
>
> See link
>
>
http://activeanswers.compaq.com/ActiveAnswers/Render/1,10
Dual Xeon MP 2,8 vs Dual P3 1,4 Tualatin (that means 0,13 microns and
512 L2 cache) its only 22% improvement on Citrix Metaframe (Terminal
Services). Thats QUITE dissapointing.
See link
http://activeanswers.compaq.com/ActiveAnswers/Render/1,1027,5684-6-100-2
25-1,00.htm
/me waits anxiously for A
6 matches
Mail list logo
